Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hoveling Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hoveling Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hoveling Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hoveling Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:45 | 45:46 to 43:01 | 56.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 06:31 to 05:19 | 24.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:31 | 02:39 to 02:08 | 10.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:40 to 04:27 | 4.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:10 | 06:35 to 06:25 | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:47 to 02:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Hoveling Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:43 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 04:08 | 04:29 +00:11 | 04:43 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 08:48 | 05:06 +00:22 | 09:12 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:47 | 14:16 | 03:00 -00:13 | 14:18 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 17:03 | 05:33 +00:02 | 17:18 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 22:38 | 05:06 -00:52 | 22:51 -00:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 26:52 | 05:32 +00:14 | 27:57 -01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:31 | 32:38 | 05:37 +00:54 | 33:29 -00:51 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 39:09 | 05:43 +00:17 | 39:06 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 45:09 | 04:53 -00:14 | 44:49 +00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 49:48 | 05:34 +00:15 | 49:42 +00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 55:37 | 02:15 +00:24 | 55:16 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:12 | 58:16 | 05:33 +00:39 | 57:31 +00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:04 | 01:04:28 | 05:21 -00:17 | 01:03:04 +01:24 |
| Running 8 | 06:52 | 01:09:32 | 06:14 +00:38 | 01:08:25 +01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 06:35 | 01:16:24 | 06:48 -00:13 | 01:14:39 +01:45 |
| Roxzone | 05:46 | 01:28:38 | 07:11 -01:25 | 01:28:38 |
Nick Hoveling delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, placing in the top 39% overall and the top 43% in his age group. His overall time was 01:28:38, with a total running time of 00:45:46, which was slightly slower than the average. This indicates that while Nick has a strong foundation, his performance could benefit from enhanced running capabilities. His fastest running lap was an impressive 00:05:28, showing potential in this area. However, his pacing strategy may need adjustment, as he started strongly but gradually slowed down in later running segments. This suggests a need for improved endurance and consistency throughout the race. Nick's performance indicates a hybrid profile with a slight leaning towards strength, as some of his strength segments were completed faster than the average, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bothe Michael | 2024 Köln | 01:28:48 | |
| Bergs Martins | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:47 | |
| Mokros Alexander | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:28:57 | |
| Chaires Francisco | 2024 Houston | 01:28:42 | |
| Park Stephen | 2024 Anaheim | 01:28:22 | |
| Marsh Calum | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:50 | |
| Frei Christian | 2022 Basel | 01:28:24 | |
| Bennett Mark | 2022 London | 01:28:32 | |
| Artlieb Sebastian | 2023 München | 01:28:25 | |
| Hanic Dominik | 2022 München | 01:28:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
