Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mccormack Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mccormack Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mccormack Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mccormack Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:00 | 06:55 to 04:55 | 36.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:14 | 05:57 to 04:43 | 22.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 06:12 to 05:07 | 19.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:35 to 02:05 | 9.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:26 | 06:37 to 06:11 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:31 to 04:24 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:51 to 02:46 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:58 to 39:58 | 0.0% |
| Mccormack Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:08 | 04:28 +00:03 | 04:42 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 08:39 | 05:01 -00:19 | 09:10 -00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 13:21 | 02:57 -00:06 | 14:11 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 16:12 | 05:27 -00:24 | 17:08 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 05:57 | 21:15 | 05:01 +00:56 | 22:35 -01:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 27:12 | 05:27 -00:17 | 27:36 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:12 | 32:22 | 05:24 +00:48 | 33:03 -00:41 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 38:34 | 05:37 -00:28 | 38:27 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 43:43 | 04:51 -00:05 | 44:04 -00:21 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 48:29 | 05:29 -00:33 | 48:55 -00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:35 | 53:25 | 02:13 +00:22 | 54:24 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 56:00 | 05:27 -00:22 | 56:37 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:55 | 01:01:05 | 05:11 +01:44 | 01:02:04 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:08:00 | 06:06 -00:17 | 01:07:15 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 06:37 | 01:13:49 | 06:37 +00:00 | 01:13:21 +00:28 |
| Roxzone | 06:46 | 01:27:02 | 07:04 -00:18 | 01:27:02 |
Jack McCormack has given an impressive performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX race, landing in the top 53% of all athletes and the top 57% in his age group. Jack displays a strong affinity for running, as evidenced by his total running time being 3:30 minutes faster than the average. From the first to the fourth running segments, Jack started relatively fast compared to the average, indicating good pacing and stamina. However, his performance in strength-based exercises and transition times, as reflected in the roxzone timing, require attention.
Jack should focus on maintaining his strong running pace while strategically saving energy for the strength-based exercises where he currently struggles. He should aim to start strength segments with a steady and controlled pace, gradually increasing intensity to avoid burnout. For exercises where he currently underperforms, focusing on proper form and efficiency can help conserve energy and improve times. Additionally, focusing on rapid recovery and transition times can shave off valuable seconds from his overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Champion Valentin | 2024 Paris | 01:26:49 | |
| Gromoll Kevin | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:49 | |
| Adentan Peter | 2022 London | 01:27:24 | |
| Frisch Taylor | 2023 Miami | 01:26:37 | |
| Mclaughlin Steven | 2024 London | 01:26:54 | |
| Mathews John | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:45 | |
| Zoller Yanik | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:43 | |
| Allshire Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:35 | |
| Lazaro Almarza Roberto | 2023 Madrid | 01:26:57 | |
| Garcia Kevin | 2024 Marseille | 01:27:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
