Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mccaffrey Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mccaffrey Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mccaffrey Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mccaffrey Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 05:52 to 04:48 | 21.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 04:50 to 03:49 | 20.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:59 | 04:44 to 03:45 | 19.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 04:38 to 03:55 | 14.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 02:39 to 02:10 | 9.7% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 04:53 to 04:26 | 9.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:50 to 01:41 | 3.0% |
| Run Total | 00:06 | 36:25 to 36:19 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Mccaffrey Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:39 | 00:00 | 04:07 -01:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 02:39 | 04:15 -00:13 | 04:07 -01:28 |
| Running 2 | 04:25 | 06:41 | 04:25 +00:00 | 08:22 -01:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 11:06 | 02:32 +00:07 | 12:47 -01:41 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 13:45 | 04:45 +00:25 | 15:19 -01:34 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 18:55 | 04:09 +00:35 | 20:04 -01:09 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 23:39 | 04:44 +00:15 | 24:13 -00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:50 | 28:38 | 04:18 +00:32 | 28:57 -00:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 33:28 | 04:52 +00:15 | 33:15 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 38:35 | 04:33 +00:20 | 38:07 +00:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:05 | 43:28 | 04:46 +00:19 | 42:40 +00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 48:33 | 01:54 -00:04 | 47:26 +01:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 50:23 | 04:45 +00:28 | 49:20 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 55:36 | 04:16 +00:22 | 54:05 +01:31 |
| Running 8 | 03:51 | 01:00:14 | 05:05 -01:14 | 58:21 +01:53 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:04:05 | 05:22 +00:30 | 01:03:26 +00:39 |
| Roxzone | 04:23 | 01:14:12 | 05:24 -01:01 | 01:14:12 |
Matthew Mccaffrey showed an impressive performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race. His overall time of 01:14:12 placed him in the top 24% of all athletes and the top 28% of his age group. His running ability was a standout, with a total running time of 00:36:25, which was a full 01:13 faster than the average. Particularly impressive was his first and last running segments, where he outpaced the average by 01:27 and 01:17 respectively.
Looking at his pacing, Matthew started the race on a very strong note, finishing the Running 1 segment significantly faster than average. His performance in the initial stages indicates a strong running profile, though there was a noticeable slowdown in subsequent running segments. This suggests that Matthew might have started too fast, leading to a slower pace in the later stages of the race.
Focusing on his overall profile, Matthew seems to lean more towards being a runner than a strength athlete. His faster total running time and exceptional performance in the Roxzone, where he was 00:55 faster than average, indicates a high level of cardiovascular fitness and running efficiency. Nonetheless, there is room for improvement, especially in strength-based segments such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Burpees Broad Jump.
Improving race pacing can benefit Matthew's performance. He should consider starting the race at a slightly slower pace to conserve energy for later stages. Additionally, working on transitions between running and strength segments can help reduce time spent in the Roxzone, leading to better overall times. Implementing strength training into his routine will also aid in maintaining a strong running pace post strength exercises.
Given his strong running profile, Matthew should also consider using a 'run hard, recover on the strength segments' strategy. This means pushing harder on the running segments where he is strong, and using the strength segments as a chance to recover. This strategy, combined with the suggested strength training, could see Matthew significantly improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson Joshua | 2023 Birmingham | 01:14:07 | |
| Rodrigues Hélder | 2023 Madrid | 01:13:49 | |
| Hewitt Jacob | 2024 Milan | 01:13:42 | |
| Lee Bernard | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:13:59 | |
| Skonieczko Adam | 2024 Poznan | 01:13:50 | |
| Ondris Robert | 2024 Anaheim | 01:14:03 | |
| Kohlhaas Michael | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:14:37 | |
| Hopwood Paul | 2023 London | 01:14:37 | |
| Slotemaker Wessel | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:14:41 | |
| Bredemeier Dario | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:14:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
