Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Haselgrove Rob's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Haselgrove Rob's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Haselgrove Rob's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Haselgrove Rob's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:05 | 43:09 to 39:04 | 95.7% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:40 to 04:35 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:30 to 02:26 | 1.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 01:54 to 01:52 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Haselgrove Rob | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:30 | 00:00 | 04:21 +01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:30 | 04:21 -00:12 | 04:21 +01:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 09:39 | 04:41 +00:34 | 08:42 +00:57 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 14:54 | 02:42 -00:12 | 13:23 +01:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 17:24 | 05:05 +00:41 | 16:05 +01:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:07 | 23:10 | 04:31 -00:24 | 21:10 +02:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 27:17 | 05:04 +00:15 | 25:41 +01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:14 | 32:36 | 04:48 -00:34 | 30:45 +01:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 36:50 | 05:12 +00:22 | 35:33 +01:17 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 42:24 | 04:40 +00:00 | 40:45 +01:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 47:04 | 05:05 -00:05 | 45:25 +01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 52:04 | 02:02 -00:08 | 50:30 +01:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 53:58 | 05:04 +00:01 | 52:32 +01:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:17 | 59:03 | 04:39 -00:22 | 57:36 +01:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:03:20 | 05:33 +00:10 | 01:02:15 +01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:42 | 01:09:03 | 05:52 -01:10 | 01:07:48 +01:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:19:44 | 06:04 +00:04 | 01:19:44 |
In the 2024 Poznan HYROX race, Rob Haselgrove exhibited a balanced performance, ranking in the top 35% of all athletes and top 36% in his age group. His overall time was 01:19:44 with a total running time of 00:43:09, which was slightly slower than the average by 02:54. This suggests that Rob leans more towards a strength-based profile, with room for improvement in his running segments. His best running lap was 00:05:00.
Rob started the race slightly slower in Running 1 and Running 2 segments, which might have affected his overall running time. However, he picked up the pace in the Running 6 and Running 7 segments. His consistency in the strength segments, such as Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, indicates his proficiency in strength exercises.
To improve his race performance, Rob should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brien Dean | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:20 | |
| Kameyama Florian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:42 | |
| Montgomery Michael | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:28 | |
| Peach Samuel | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:31 | |
| Mckenzie Peter | 2023 Glasgow | 01:19:18 | |
| Botterill William | 2023 London | 01:20:07 | |
| Kling Bram | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:33 | |
| Lam Johnathan | 2024 Singapore | 01:19:47 | |
| Ochab Slawomir | 2023 New York | 01:19:47 | |
| Escorcio Courtenay | 2024 London | 01:19:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:10 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:29:33 | |
| 2022 London | 01:24:23 | |
| 2023 London | 01:22:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
