Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:09 (From 08:07 to 05:58) | 45.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:05 (From 05:40 to 04:35) | 22.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:37 (From 04:59 to 04:22) | 12.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 (From 05:12 to 04:46) | 9.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 (From 02:26 to 02:01) | 8.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 (From 02:44 to 02:40) | 1.4% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:32 to 04:32) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:35 to 04:35) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 40:35 to 40:35) | 0.0% |
| Gell Oliver | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 04:08 | 04:26 +00:33 | 04:35 -00:27 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 09:07 | 04:54 -00:12 | 09:01 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 13:49 | 02:51 -00:07 | 13:55 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 16:33 | 05:22 -00:18 | 16:46 -00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 21:37 | 04:52 +00:48 | 22:08 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 27:17 | 05:20 -00:07 | 27:00 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:32 | 32:30 | 05:16 -00:44 | 32:20 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 37:02 | 05:30 -00:10 | 37:36 -00:34 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 42:22 | 04:48 -00:13 | 43:06 -00:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 46:57 | 05:21 -00:03 | 47:54 -00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 52:15 | 02:09 +00:17 | 53:15 -01:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 54:41 | 05:20 +00:02 | 55:24 -00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:12 | 01:00:03 | 05:02 +00:10 | 01:00:44 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 05:32 | 01:05:15 | 05:57 -00:25 | 01:05:46 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 08:07 | 01:10:47 | 06:25 +01:42 | 01:11:43 -00:56 |
| Roxzone | 06:06 | 01:24:52 | 06:44 -00:38 | 01:24:52 |
Oliver's best running lap was 00:04:08, which was 17 seconds faster than the average. This indicates that he has good running speed and endurance.
To improve performance in the Wall Balls segment, Oliver should focus on increasing his strength and endurance. He can incorporate exercises such as squats, lunges, and shoulder presses into his training routine. Additionally, practicing Wall Balls with proper form and technique will help him improve his efficiency in this exercise.
In the Ski Erg segment, Oliver was 35 seconds slower than the average. To improve in this area, he should focus on his upper body strength and cardiovascular endurance. Incorporating exercises such as rowing, push-ups, and pull-ups into his training routine will help him build the necessary strength. Additionally, interval training on the Ski Erg machine will improve his cardiovascular endurance.
The Sled Pull segment was another area where Oliver lost time compared to the average. To improve in this segment, he should focus on improving his lower body strength and explosiveness. Exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and lunges will help him build the necessary strength. Additionally, incorporating plyometric exercises such as box jumps and explosive step-ups will improve his explosiveness and power.
In the Sandbag Lunges segment, Oliver was 14 seconds slower than the average. To improve in this area, he should focus on improving his lower body strength and stability. Exercises such as lunges, squats, and Bulgarian split squats will help him build strength in his legs. Additionally, incorporating balance and stability exercises such as single-leg deadlifts and single-leg squats will improve his stability during lunges.
The Farmers Carry segment was another area where Oliver lost time compared to the average. To improve in this segment, he should focus on improving his grip strength and overall upper body strength. Exercises such as farmer's carries, deadlifts, and pull-ups will help him build the necessary strength. Additionally, incorporating grip strength exercises such as towel pull-ups and plate pinches will improve his grip strength.
In terms of his profile, Oliver seems to have a better running profile, as indicated by his faster total running time compared to the average. To further enhance his running performance, he should incorporate interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs into his training routine. This will help him improve his speed, endurance, and overall running performance.
Overall, Oliver Gell had a solid performance in the HYROX race in London. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can continue to enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Arzate Díaz José Sebastian | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:24:40 | |
| Pazoureck Brad | 2023 Houston | 01:25:01 | |
| Timinti Michele | 2024 Turin | 01:24:36 | |
| Alosi Francesco | 2024 Milan | 01:24:27 | |
| Heaven Adam | 2024 Paris | 01:24:42 | |
| TannerDavies Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:49 | |
| Jourdain Maxime | 2024 Paris | 01:25:22 | |
| Crespo Jose | 2023 Barcelona | 01:25:00 | |
| Jetses Fabio | 2022 Berlin | 01:24:48 | |
| Mazarguil Thibault | 2024 Paris | 01:25:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Gell Oliver
