Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Silsbury Scott's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Silsbury Scott hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Silsbury Scott’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Silsbury Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:40 | 45:41 to 43:01 | 53.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:46 | 07:05 to 05:19 | 35.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:27 to 04:53 | 11.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Silsbury Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:53 | 04:29 -00:02 | 04:45 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 08:20 | 05:06 +00:18 | 09:14 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 13:44 | 03:00 -00:10 | 14:20 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:58 | 16:34 | 05:33 +00:25 | 17:20 -00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:27 | 22:32 | 05:08 +00:19 | 22:53 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 27:59 | 05:33 +00:17 | 28:01 -00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:05 | 33:49 | 05:38 +01:27 | 33:34 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 40:54 | 05:44 +00:15 | 39:12 +01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 46:53 | 04:53 -00:04 | 44:56 +01:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:57 | 51:42 | 05:35 +00:22 | 49:49 +01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 57:39 | 02:16 -00:23 | 55:24 +02:15 |
| Running 7 | 06:05 | 59:32 | 05:34 +00:31 | 57:40 +01:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:02 | 01:05:37 | 05:23 -00:21 | 01:03:14 +02:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:10:39 | 06:14 +00:25 | 01:08:37 +02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 05:13 | 01:17:18 | 06:49 -01:36 | 01:14:51 +02:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:30 | 01:28:52 | 07:12 -00:42 | 01:28:52 |
Scott Silsbury delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, finishing in the top 71% of all athletes and top 73% in his age group (35-39). His overall running time was slightly slower than average (01:24), indicating that his strength lies more with the strength-based exercises rather than running. Scott's performance in the first 4 running segments suggests that he started the race at a higher pace than the average competitor, which could have contributed to his slower running times in later segments. This suggests that pacing is an area that Scott can focus on for improvement.
Scott's key areas for improvement are the total running time, Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Pull, and the Roxzone transition times.
Implementing effective race strategies can significantly improve Scott's performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hansen Oke | 2019 Hamburg | 01:29:05 | |
| Begley Kevin | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:39 | |
| Batteux Timothée | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:14 | |
| Samyn Maxime | 2024 Paris | 01:28:50 | |
| Fischer Wolfgang | 2024 Köln | 01:29:01 | |
| Corley Darryl | 2022 London | 01:28:29 | |
| Savelli Brice | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:04 | |
| Marrón Martínez Ruben | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:30 | |
| Crick Chris | 2024 Poznan | 01:28:51 | |
| Lee Max | 2024 Singapore | 01:28:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
