Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 234 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Marum Harriet's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Marum Harriet's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Marum Harriet's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Marum Harriet's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:15 | 39:16 to 37:01 | 69.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 04:39 to 03:59 | 20.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:23 to 02:05 | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Marum Harriet | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:18 | 00:00 | 04:14 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 03:18 | 04:38 -00:08 | 04:14 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 07:48 | 04:31 +00:14 | 08:52 -01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 12:33 | 03:31 -01:17 | 13:23 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 14:47 | 04:48 +00:17 | 16:54 -02:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 19:52 | 05:33 -00:35 | 21:42 -01:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 24:50 | 04:50 +00:20 | 27:15 -02:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:39 | 30:00 | 04:20 +00:19 | 32:05 -02:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 34:39 | 04:54 +00:26 | 36:25 -01:46 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 39:59 | 04:50 -00:05 | 41:19 -01:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 44:44 | 04:50 +00:18 | 46:09 -01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 49:52 | 02:16 +00:07 | 50:59 -01:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 52:15 | 04:53 +00:18 | 53:15 -01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:11 | 57:26 | 04:24 -00:13 | 58:08 -00:42 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 01:01:37 | 05:06 +00:16 | 01:02:32 -00:55 |
| Wall Balls | 04:48 | 01:06:59 | 05:24 -00:36 | 01:07:38 -00:39 |
| Roxzone | 06:22 | 01:18:01 | 04:59 +01:23 | 01:18:01 |
Harriet Marum demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race. Her overall rank within the top 30% of the athletes and a rank of 6 in her age group shows her competitive spirit. However, Harriet's total running time was slower than the average by 01:05, indicating that she has a better strength profile.
Her performance in the initial segments of the race, particularly during Running 1, was notably strong, with her time being 00:55 faster than the average. This could suggest that Harriet started the race at a significantly faster pace than the average competitor. However, over time, her running segments progressively slowed down compared to the average.
Based on the analysis of Harriet's performance, we recommend several race strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Simson Emelie | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:18:02 | |
| Mccleery Kassandra | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:18:18 | |
| Maciver Sharon | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:17:31 | |
| Irwin Ellevyn | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:18 | |
| Payton Hayley | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:10 | |
| Dinjens Saskia | 2023 Köln | 01:17:49 | |
| Glemas Solenn | 2024 Bilbao | 01:18:21 | |
| Ekstrand Beatrice | 2024 Stockholm | 01:17:31 | |
| Jaud Christina | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:17:52 | |
| Hahn Sabrina | 2023 Hamburg | 01:17:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:11:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
