Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Heald John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Heald John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Heald John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Heald John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:50 | 06:02 to 04:12 | 39.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:08 | 02:56 to 01:48 | 24.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 05:00 to 04:12 | 17.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:43 to 04:02 | 14.9% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:37 to 04:32 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:24 to 02:20 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:37 to 37:37 | 0.0% |
| Heald John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:02 | 00:00 | 04:18 -01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:02 | 04:19 -00:17 | 04:18 -01:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:14 | 07:04 | 04:36 -00:22 | 08:37 -01:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 11:18 | 02:39 -00:15 | 13:13 -01:55 |
| Running 3 | 04:45 | 13:42 | 04:59 -00:14 | 15:52 -02:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 18:27 | 04:25 +00:18 | 20:51 -02:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 23:10 | 04:58 +00:03 | 25:16 -02:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 28:11 | 04:36 +00:24 | 30:14 -02:03 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 33:11 | 05:06 -00:07 | 34:50 -01:39 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 38:10 | 04:38 -00:01 | 39:56 -01:46 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 42:47 | 05:00 -00:03 | 44:34 -01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:56 | 47:44 | 01:59 +00:57 | 49:34 -01:50 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 50:40 | 04:59 +00:04 | 51:33 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:02 | 55:43 | 04:32 +01:30 | 56:32 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:01:45 | 05:26 +00:13 | 01:01:04 +00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:07:24 | 05:42 -00:43 | 01:06:30 +00:54 |
| Roxzone | 05:54 | 01:18:07 | 05:55 -00:01 | 01:18:07 |
John Heald demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, with an overall rank of 186 out of 211 athletes. His strongest area was clearly running, as evidenced by a total running time of 00:37:37, which was 01:57 faster than the average time. He started the race exceptionally well, with his time in Running 1 being 01:16 faster than the average. This indicates a strong start and effective pacing strategy. However, there seems to be a trend of slowing down in strength-based segments as the race progressed, suggesting that endurance in strength exercises could be a potential area for improvement.
John should continue to capitalize on his strong running ability, but also consider pacing himself slightly more conservatively in the early stages of the race to conserve energy for the more strength-based segments later on. Regularly training in compromised running scenarios post specific exercises may also help John prepare for the demands of the race. Furthermore, focusing on transition times between exercises during training can help to shave off crucial seconds in the Roxzone segment during the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bouteville Pierre | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:21 | |
| Hansen Kim | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:16 | |
| Desomberg Antoine | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:18:04 | |
| Shifferaw Alex | 2024 Köln | 01:17:50 | |
| Komosinski Lukasz | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:17:51 | |
| Kowalski Mariusz | 2024 Katowice | 01:18:20 | |
| Nunn Richard | 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:58 | |
| Ruiz Miler Juan | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:01 | |
| Baker Jonno | 2024 Sydney | 01:18:13 | |
| Zillén Fredrik | 2024 Malaga | 01:18:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
