Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 230 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ackers Rachel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ackers Rachel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ackers Rachel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ackers Rachel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:30 | 37:27 to 35:57 | 32.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:39 | 05:21 to 04:42 | 14.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:35 | 05:20 to 04:45 | 12.6% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 05:11 to 04:41 | 10.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 04:28 to 03:59 | 10.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:28 | 03:23 to 02:55 | 10.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:44 to 04:28 | 5.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 03:53 to 03:47 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:04 to 01:59 | 1.8% |
| Ackers Rachel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:07 | 00:00 | 04:05 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 03:07 | 04:35 +00:09 | 04:05 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 07:51 | 04:25 +00:05 | 08:40 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 12:21 | 03:20 +00:03 | 13:05 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 15:44 | 04:42 +00:10 | 16:25 -00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 20:36 | 05:16 +00:04 | 21:07 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 25:56 | 04:45 +00:05 | 26:23 -00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:53 | 30:46 | 04:17 -00:24 | 31:08 -00:22 |
| Running 5 | 05:04 | 34:39 | 04:49 +00:15 | 35:25 -00:46 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 39:43 | 04:48 +00:23 | 40:14 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 04:50 | 44:54 | 04:44 +00:06 | 45:02 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 49:44 | 02:12 -00:08 | 49:46 -00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 51:48 | 04:47 +00:13 | 51:58 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:28 | 56:48 | 04:18 +00:10 | 56:45 +00:03 |
| Running 8 | 05:19 | 01:01:16 | 05:02 +00:17 | 01:01:03 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:21 | 01:06:35 | 05:10 +00:11 | 01:06:05 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 04:24 | 01:16:09 | 04:54 -00:30 | 01:16:09 |
Rachel Ackers' performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX PRO race was commendable, finishing in the top 20% of all athletes and the top 35% in her age group. While her overall time was impressive, her total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Her best running lap was competitive, but inconsistent pacing across the different running segments may have affected her overall time.
It appears that Rachel started the race too quickly, as evidenced by her Running 1 time, which was significantly faster than average. This could have led to premature fatigue, impacting her performance in subsequent segments. Her strength exercises, such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push and Pull, and Wall Balls, were all slower than average. This suggests that Rachel's profile leans more towards running than strength.
Rachel should consider moderating her pace at the start of the race to preserve energy for later segments. She may want to adopt a more conservative pace during the early running segments, gradually increasing her speed as the race progresses. This strategy, known as negative splits, can help prevent early fatigue and improve overall performance.
During strength segments, Rachel should focus on maintaining good form and using her energy efficiently. She may benefit from practicing transitions between running and strength segments to minimize rest time.
Lastly, Rachel can work on her mental stamina by incorporating mindfulness and visualization techniques into her training, helping her to stay focused and motivated throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knappstein Julia | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:15:53 | |
| Irons Leah | 2024 Dallas | 01:15:41 | |
| Bakewell Addison | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:16:37 | |
| Robowski Kendall | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:16:32 | |
| Alpmann Jennifer | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:16:38 | |
| Thielen Xenia | 2023 Hamburg | 01:16:09 | |
| Hogan Dena | 2021 London | 01:15:49 | |
| Yannaros Alexia | 2023 London | 01:16:15 | |
| Tumahai April | 2024 Brisbane | 01:15:51 | |
| Stawczynski Louisa | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:16:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:08:29 | |
| 2023 London | 01:21:26 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:19:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
