Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Vries Jolle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Vries Jolle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Vries Jolle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Vries Jolle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:37 | 06:49 to 04:12 | 46.7% |
| Run Total | 01:19 | 39:26 to 38:07 | 23.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 04:31 to 04:02 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:43 to 02:20 | 6.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 04:33 to 04:12 | 6.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:24 to 04:13 | 3.3% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:40 to 04:32 | 2.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 01:56 to 01:48 | 2.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| De Vries Jolle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:12 | 00:00 | 04:18 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:12 | 04:19 +00:05 | 04:18 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 07:36 | 04:37 +00:02 | 08:37 -01:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 12:15 | 02:40 +00:03 | 13:14 -00:59 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 14:58 | 05:00 +00:06 | 15:54 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 20:04 | 04:25 +00:06 | 20:54 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 24:35 | 04:58 +00:06 | 25:19 -00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 29:39 | 04:37 +02:12 | 30:17 -00:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 36:28 | 05:07 +00:05 | 34:54 +01:34 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 41:40 | 04:38 +00:02 | 40:01 +01:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 46:20 | 05:00 +00:10 | 44:39 +01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 51:30 | 02:00 -00:04 | 49:39 +01:51 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 53:26 | 04:59 +00:11 | 51:39 +01:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 58:36 | 04:32 +00:01 | 56:38 +01:58 |
| Running 8 | 05:56 | 01:03:09 | 05:26 +00:30 | 01:01:10 +01:59 |
| Wall Balls | 03:50 | 01:09:05 | 05:42 -01:52 | 01:06:36 +02:29 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:18:12 | 05:54 -00:30 | 01:18:12 |
However, it is important to note that Jolle's total running time of 00:39:26 was 01:12 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to improve his running performance to enhance his overall race time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:03:12 suggests that he has the potential to further excel in running.
In conclusion, Jolle De Vries performed well in the HYROX race, achieving a high overall rank and demonstrating his fitness level. To further improve his performance, he should focus on enhancing his running speed and endurance, particularly in the segments where he lost the most time. Incorporating interval training, tempo runs, and strength exercises will help him reach his full potential and continue excelling in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ritch Ollie | 2022 London | 01:18:40 | |
| Hogarth Callum | 2023 London | 01:18:23 | |
| Pan Jingwei | 2024 Incheon | 01:18:03 | |
| Coombs Andrew John | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:23 | |
| Vorpasso Matthew | 2023 Melbourne | 01:18:18 | |
| Clark Nick | 2024 Sydney | 01:18:03 | |
| Court Ben | 2023 London | 01:17:55 | |
| Jaschik Jannis | 2022 Hamburg | 01:18:18 | |
| Zoeteman Rob | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:18:22 | |
| Cooper Ashton | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:13:39 | |
| 2024 Stuttgart | 01:17:16 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:01 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:23:07 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:14:19 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
