Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scott Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scott Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scott Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scott Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:56 | 07:31 to 05:35 | 47.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:13 | 06:34 to 05:21 | 29.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 06:19 to 05:57 | 9.0% |
| Run Total | 00:21 | 46:01 to 45:40 | 8.6% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:08 to 04:58 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:37 to 04:34 | 1.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:59 to 06:59 | 0.0% |
| Scott Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 04:01 | 04:35 +00:02 | 04:58 -00:57 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 08:38 | 05:23 +00:09 | 09:33 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 14:10 | 03:12 -00:08 | 14:56 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 17:14 | 05:52 -00:07 | 18:08 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 06:34 | 22:59 | 05:31 +01:03 | 24:00 -01:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 29:33 | 05:52 +00:05 | 29:31 +00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:19 | 35:30 | 06:14 +00:05 | 35:23 +00:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 41:49 | 06:05 -00:02 | 41:37 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 47:52 | 05:02 +00:06 | 47:42 +00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:53 | 53:00 | 05:54 -00:01 | 52:44 +00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 58:53 | 02:25 -00:25 | 58:38 +00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 01:00:53 | 05:52 +00:03 | 01:01:03 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:31 | 01:06:48 | 05:50 +01:41 | 01:06:55 -00:07 |
| Running 8 | 06:58 | 01:14:19 | 06:48 +00:10 | 01:12:45 +01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 06:59 | 01:21:17 | 07:31 -00:32 | 01:19:33 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 06:59 | 01:35:08 | 08:04 -01:05 | 01:35:08 |
Tim Scott delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, finishing in the top 52% of his age group. His total running time was 00:46:01, which was 01:07 faster than the average, suggesting that he has a strong running profile. However, his split analysis indicates variability in pacing, with the initial running segments (Running 1) significantly faster than average, possibly indicating a fast start. As the race progressed, his running times aligned more closely with or slightly slower than the average, suggesting potential fatigue or strategic pacing adjustments. Overall, Tim demonstrates a runner's strength, but there is room to improve his strength and endurance in specific exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kooi Thomas | 2023 Valencia | 01:35:23 | |
| De Santiago Erick | 2021 Dallas | 01:35:11 | |
| Scholte Patrick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:28 | |
| Härtl Lukas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:35:04 | |
| Dorrepaal Dennis | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:10 | |
| Rashid Ramsay | 2023 London | 01:34:45 | |
| Pfefferer Florian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:35:37 | |
| Peterson Thor | 2021 New York | 01:34:44 | |
| van Tongerlo Djarno | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:35:20 | |
| Lie Sui An | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:34:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Sydney | 01:30:38 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
