Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 715 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Renleo Quirine's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Renleo Quirine's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Renleo Quirine's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Renleo Quirine's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:22 | 56:09 to 51:47 | 59.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:35 | 09:08 to 07:33 | 21.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:14 | 06:56 to 05:42 | 16.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 06:51 to 06:43 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Renleo Quirine | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 05:43 -01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 04:23 | 05:23 -00:29 | 05:43 -01:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:45 | 09:17 | 06:12 +00:33 | 11:06 -01:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 16:02 | 03:10 -00:30 | 17:18 -01:16 |
| Running 3 | 06:52 | 18:42 | 06:36 +00:16 | 20:28 -01:46 |
| Sled Pull | 06:51 | 25:34 | 06:45 +00:06 | 27:04 -01:30 |
| Running 4 | 07:08 | 32:25 | 06:37 +00:31 | 33:49 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:08 | 39:33 | 07:46 +01:22 | 40:26 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 07:19 | 48:41 | 06:52 +00:27 | 48:12 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 56:00 | 05:44 -00:39 | 55:04 +00:56 |
| Running 6 | 07:31 | 01:01:05 | 06:45 +00:46 | 01:00:48 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 01:08:36 | 02:33 -00:43 | 01:07:33 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 07:31 | 01:10:26 | 06:41 +00:50 | 01:10:06 +00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:56 | 01:17:57 | 05:50 +01:06 | 01:16:47 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 08:44 | 01:24:53 | 07:27 +01:17 | 01:22:37 +02:16 |
| Wall Balls | 03:36 | 01:33:37 | 06:18 -02:42 | 01:30:04 +03:33 |
| Roxzone | 08:03 | 01:45:07 | 08:45 -00:42 | 01:45:07 |
Renleo's pacing throughout the race seems to be consistent, with some segments performed faster than average and others slower. Her overall profile leans more towards a hybrid athlete, as she performs well in both running and strength-based segments.
In conclusion, Quirine Renleo had a strong performance in the HYROX race in Amsterdam. To further enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her overall fitness, reducing transition time, and targeting specific areas for improvement, such as burpees, sandbag lunges, and running segments. By implementing the suggested training strategies, techniques, and race strategies, Renleo can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Searle Nicole | 2024 London | 01:45:31 | |
| Hodgkinson Britta | 2023 Hamburg | 01:44:48 | |
| Afzal Aneela | 2023 Glasgow | 01:44:56 | |
| Henderson Gemma | 2024 Madrid | 01:44:46 | |
| Lopez Bordes Mariana | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:45:29 | |
| Neidhardt Theresa | 2019 Hannover | 01:45:01 | |
| Bellevaux Laurene | 2024 Turin | 01:44:53 | |
| Harrison Kendra | 2024 Anaheim | 01:45:11 | |
| Thorby Naomi | 2024 London | 01:44:37 | |
| Spooner Aoife | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:44:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:36:31 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:46:04 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:44:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
