Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 337 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lafferty Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lafferty Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lafferty Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lafferty Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 05:37 | 09:50 to 04:13 | 67.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:25 | 10:40 to 08:15 | 29.2% |
| Run Total | 00:15 | 55:48 to 55:33 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:39 to 06:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:23 to 06:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:50 to 06:50 | 0.0% |
| Lafferty Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:46 | 00:00 | 05:51 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:46 | 04:56 -00:28 | 05:51 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:37 | 10:14 | 06:29 -00:52 | 10:47 -00:33 |
| Sled Push | 09:50 | 15:51 | 04:04 +05:46 | 17:16 -01:25 |
| Running 3 | 08:04 | 25:41 | 07:22 +00:42 | 21:20 +04:21 |
| Sled Pull | 06:39 | 33:45 | 07:12 -00:33 | 28:42 +05:03 |
| Running 4 | 07:36 | 40:24 | 07:27 +00:09 | 35:54 +04:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:40 | 48:00 | 08:32 +02:08 | 43:21 +04:39 |
| Running 5 | 06:37 | 58:40 | 07:51 -01:14 | 51:53 +06:47 |
| Rowing | 05:28 | 01:05:17 | 05:32 -00:04 | 59:44 +05:33 |
| Running 6 | 06:17 | 01:10:45 | 07:28 -01:11 | 01:05:16 +05:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:04 | 01:17:02 | 02:58 +00:06 | 01:12:44 +04:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:20:06 | 07:33 -01:16 | 01:15:42 +04:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:23 | 01:26:23 | 07:53 -01:30 | 01:23:15 +03:08 |
| Running 8 | 09:37 | 01:32:46 | 09:41 -00:04 | 01:31:08 +01:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:50 | 01:42:23 | 10:04 -03:14 | 01:40:49 +01:34 |
| Roxzone | 13:02 | 02:02:07 | 11:14 +01:48 | 02:02:07 |
Overall, Luke Lafferty showed strong running ability in the 2022 London Hyrox race. To further improve his performance, he should focus on developing his upper body and leg strength, improving his explosiveness and cardiovascular endurance, and enhancing his overall fitness and transition speed. Implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques will help Luke enhance his performance in these areas and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Menga Francesco | 2024 Milan | 02:02:16 | |
| Monichino Albert | 2024 Sydney | 02:01:45 | |
| Gholam Mohammad Reza | 2023 Hamburg | 02:02:12 | |
| Nelson Danny | 2022 London | 02:01:54 | |
| Pimmler Christian | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 02:02:32 | |
| Lim Erwin | 2024 Paris | 02:02:09 | |
| Ghebremariam Adonay | 2023 Amsterdam | 02:02:16 | |
| Camarena Jose De Jesus | 2024 Mexico City | 02:02:18 | |
| Ortiz Lopez Rodrigo | 2024 Mexico City | 02:02:00 | |
| 蔡 孟嘉 | 2024 Taipei | 02:02:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
