Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kamel Heba's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kamel Heba's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kamel Heba's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kamel Heba's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:28 | 06:53 to 04:25 | 50.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 06:30 to 05:42 | 16.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:32 | 05:33 to 05:01 | 10.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 05:48 to 05:18 | 10.2% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:38 to 05:16 | 7.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:44 to 02:32 | 4.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:07 to 02:06 | 0.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:57 to 42:57 | 0.0% |
| Kamel Heba | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 05:09 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:33 | 05:27 | 05:06 +00:27 | 05:09 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 11:00 | 05:26 -00:36 | 10:15 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 15:50 | 02:44 +00:00 | 15:41 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 18:34 | 05:45 -00:40 | 18:25 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:48 | 23:39 | 05:41 +00:07 | 24:10 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 29:27 | 05:45 -00:18 | 29:51 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:30 | 34:54 | 05:58 +00:32 | 35:36 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 41:24 | 05:53 -00:31 | 41:34 -00:10 |
| Rowing | 05:38 | 46:46 | 05:21 +00:17 | 47:27 -00:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 52:24 | 05:48 -00:31 | 52:48 -00:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 57:41 | 02:15 -00:08 | 58:36 -00:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 59:48 | 05:45 -00:22 | 01:00:51 -01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:44 | 01:05:11 | 04:42 -00:58 | 01:06:36 -01:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:08:55 | 06:07 +00:03 | 01:11:18 -02:23 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:15:05 | 04:52 +02:01 | 01:17:25 -02:20 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:29:01 | 06:44 +00:28 | 01:29:01 |
Heba Kamel demonstrated a commendable performance in the HYROX 2024 Poznan race. Her overall time of 01:29:01 placed her in the top 10% of all athletes—a significant achievement. Heba excelled particularly in her running segments, with a total running time of 00:42:57, which was 03:00 faster than the average. This suggests she has a strong running profile. Her best running lap was completed in an impressive 00:04:50. Her performance, however, showed some variation in the initial segments of the race. She started off slightly slower than average in Running 1 but significantly improved her pace in Running 2 and Running 3. This indicates that she might have started the race too slow but managed to catch up and maintain a fast pace thereafter.
Based on the analysis of her performance, Heba could benefit from the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Rebecca | 2023 London | 01:29:17 | |
| Iliffe Rachel | 2022 London | 01:28:43 | |
| Collins Iris | 2023 Madrid | 01:28:51 | |
| Dancau Ana | 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:06 | |
| Dodds Meghan | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:54 | |
| Obrien Tracey | 2022 London | 01:28:55 | |
| Meuser Anna | 2023 Köln | 01:28:31 | |
| Lütjens Claudia | 2023 Hannover | 01:29:13 | |
| Muphy Steph | 2023 London | 01:28:57 | |
| Barton Abbie | 2023 Manchester | 01:28:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
