Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Goldenberg Chloe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Goldenberg Chloe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Goldenberg Chloe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Goldenberg Chloe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:38 | 50:33 to 46:55 | 62.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:36 | 06:30 to 04:54 | 27.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:35 to 02:13 | 6.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 05:01 to 04:52 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:46 to 02:44 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:15 to 06:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Goldenberg Chloe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:31 | 00:00 | 05:16 -01:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 03:31 | 05:11 -00:30 | 05:16 -01:45 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 08:12 | 05:39 +00:31 | 10:27 -02:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 14:22 | 02:52 -00:06 | 16:06 -01:44 |
| Running 3 | 06:25 | 17:08 | 05:59 +00:26 | 18:58 -01:50 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 23:33 | 06:04 -00:52 | 24:57 -01:24 |
| Running 4 | 06:23 | 28:45 | 06:00 +00:23 | 31:01 -02:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 35:08 | 06:36 -00:21 | 37:01 -01:53 |
| Running 5 | 08:17 | 41:23 | 06:10 +02:07 | 43:37 -02:14 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 49:40 | 05:27 -00:04 | 49:47 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 06:41 | 55:03 | 06:03 +00:38 | 55:14 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:35 | 01:01:44 | 02:22 +00:13 | 01:01:17 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 06:30 | 01:04:19 | 06:03 +00:27 | 01:03:39 +00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 01:10:49 | 05:04 -00:03 | 01:09:42 +01:07 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:15:50 | 06:33 +00:06 | 01:14:46 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 06:30 | 01:22:29 | 05:18 +01:12 | 01:21:19 +01:10 |
| Roxzone | 05:04 | 01:33:56 | 07:19 -02:15 | 01:33:56 |
Chloe Goldenberg gave a commendable performance finishing in the Top 17% overall and Top 20% in her age group. Her total running time, however, was 2 minutes and 38 seconds slower than the average, suggesting that running should be a primary area of focus for her training. The athlete started the race strong, with her time for Running 1 being 1 minute and 42 seconds faster than average. Despite slowing down in the later running segments, her roxzone time was 2 minutes and 8 seconds faster than average, indicating good overall fitness and transition times.
Chloe should focus on pacing herself more effectively throughout the race. Starting strong is good, but she needs to conserve her energy to maintain a steady pace during later segments. She should aim to keep a consistent pace during the running segments, rather than starting fast and slowing down. Practicing race simulations as part of her training can help her get a better feel for her optimal pace. Lastly, during the race, she should focus on her transitions and try to minimize rest time in the roxzone, as these areas are where she excels and can gain time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Holmes Ella | 2024 London | 01:33:49 | |
| Rasche Yvonne | 2023 Hamburg | 01:33:49 | |
| Jasper Alex | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:29 | |
| Hammett Claire | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:48 | |
| Gilchrist Angela | 2023 London | 01:34:14 | |
| Chang Vanessa | 2022 Dallas | 01:33:27 | |
| Cristilli Alice | 2024 Rimini | 01:33:30 | |
| Steinert Eva | 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:50 | |
| Ranzani Arianna | 2024 Rimini | 01:34:11 | |
| Dass Helen | 2022 London | 01:33:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
