Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Backer Nino's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Backer Nino's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Backer Nino's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Backer Nino's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:13 | 40:44 to 38:31 | 48.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 05:31 to 04:17 | 27.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:47 to 04:06 | 15.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:25 to 04:14 | 4.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 04:23 to 04:16 | 2.6% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:39 to 04:33 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| De Backer Nino | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:29 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 03:29 | 04:20 +00:05 | 04:20 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 07:54 | 04:39 +00:15 | 08:40 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 12:48 | 02:41 -00:26 | 13:19 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 15:03 | 05:02 +00:31 | 16:00 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 20:36 | 04:27 +00:20 | 21:02 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 25:23 | 05:00 +00:35 | 25:29 -00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:31 | 30:58 | 04:43 +00:48 | 30:29 +00:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 36:29 | 05:10 +00:15 | 35:12 +01:17 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 41:54 | 04:39 +00:00 | 40:22 +01:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 46:33 | 05:03 +00:09 | 45:01 +01:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 51:45 | 02:01 -00:25 | 50:04 +01:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 53:21 | 05:01 +00:13 | 52:05 +01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:23 | 58:35 | 04:36 -00:13 | 57:06 +01:29 |
| Running 8 | 05:26 | 01:02:58 | 05:29 -00:03 | 01:01:42 +01:16 |
| Wall Balls | 05:00 | 01:08:24 | 05:47 -00:47 | 01:07:11 +01:13 |
| Roxzone | 05:42 | 01:18:56 | 05:58 -00:16 | 01:18:56 |
Nino De Backer performed well in the Hyrox race, finishing in the top 15% of all athletes and in the top 23% of his age group. His overall time of 01:18:56 was respectable, but there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his performance.
In terms of pacing, Nino's total running time of 00:40:44 was 02:16 slower than the average. This indicates that he may have rested more or taken more time during the transition zones. To improve this segment, Nino should focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time.
Additionally, Nino's total running time suggests that he has more of a runner profile and should focus on training his strength.
In conclusion, Nino De Backer has demonstrated a strong performance in the Hyrox race. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition time, and enhancing his running performance. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Nino can continue to excel in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Howson Marc | 2022 Manchester | 01:18:27 | |
| Rex Simon | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:45 | |
| Bes Jérôme | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:18:39 | |
| Seiffert Lars | 2024 Malaga | 01:18:36 | |
| Horst Marco | 2024 Hamburg | 01:19:09 | |
| Ging Alex | 2023 Barcelona | 01:18:55 | |
| King Martyn | 2024 Bilbao | 01:18:36 | |
| Van Der Weijden Jeroen | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:59 | |
| Rae William | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:19:16 | |
| O'Toole Michael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:13:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
