Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Mexico City using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cameron Fraser's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cameron Fraser's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cameron Fraser's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cameron Fraser's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:10 | 42:36 to 39:26 | 64.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 05:04 to 04:15 | 16.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 04:48 to 04:30 | 6.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:43 to 02:28 | 5.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:08 to 01:54 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:23 to 04:16 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Cameron Fraser | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:02 | 00:00 | 04:24 -00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:02 | 04:22 +00:01 | 04:24 -00:22 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 08:25 | 04:45 +00:03 | 08:46 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 13:13 | 02:44 -00:01 | 13:31 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 15:56 | 05:08 +00:20 | 16:15 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 21:24 | 04:36 +00:28 | 21:23 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 26:28 | 05:07 +00:20 | 25:59 +00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:48 | 31:55 | 04:57 -00:09 | 31:06 +00:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 36:43 | 05:16 +00:18 | 36:03 +00:40 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 42:17 | 04:41 -00:17 | 41:19 +00:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 46:41 | 05:09 +00:21 | 46:00 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 52:11 | 02:04 +00:04 | 51:09 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 54:19 | 05:07 +00:30 | 53:13 +01:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:46 | 59:56 | 04:46 -01:00 | 58:20 +01:36 |
| Running 8 | 06:13 | 01:03:42 | 05:36 +00:37 | 01:03:06 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:09:55 | 06:01 -00:56 | 01:08:42 +01:13 |
| Roxzone | 06:06 | 01:20:59 | 06:16 -00:10 | 01:20:59 |
Fraser Cameron showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Mexico City HYROX race, finishing within the top 6% of 400 athletes and standing 4th in his age group, which is quite impressive. His overall time was 01:20:59. Notably, his total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Fraser’s performance in the Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls was exceptionally strong, placing him well ahead of the average. However, his pacing in the initial runs suggests he started slightly too fast, which might have impacted his stamina in later segments. His profile suggests a hybrid athlete, yet leaning more towards strength rather than running, considering his total running time was below average.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested strategies, Fraser Cameron can enhance his performance in future HYROX races. Consistent training, strategic planning, and attention to recovery and nutrition will be crucial in achieving his goals.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sugameli Leandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:21:22 | |
| Gilbert Daniel | 2022 Manchester | 01:20:54 | |
| Machingura Roy | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:40 | |
| Bennett Alex | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:54 | |
| Salvador Aviles Antonio | 2019 New York | 01:20:59 | |
| Carlin Conor | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:44 | |
| Brown Edward | 2024 London | 01:21:24 | |
| Carmody Darragh | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:21:13 | |
| Martin Jordan | 2023 London | 01:20:54 | |
| Gielen Pascal | 2024 Köln | 01:20:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
