Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Burns Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Burns Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Burns Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burns Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 05:43 to 05:14 | 26.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:28 | 06:16 to 05:48 | 25.2% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:18 to 04:56 | 19.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 07:20 to 06:58 | 19.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:41 to 04:33 | 7.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:19 to 02:17 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:26 to 43:26 | 0.0% |
| Burns Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:20 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 05:20 | 04:33 +00:08 | 04:52 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 10:01 | 05:19 -00:15 | 09:25 +00:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 15:05 | 03:09 -00:38 | 14:44 +00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 17:36 | 05:47 -00:43 | 17:53 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:43 | 22:40 | 05:25 +00:18 | 23:40 -01:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 28:23 | 05:47 -00:30 | 29:05 -00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:16 | 33:40 | 06:02 +00:14 | 34:52 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 39:56 | 05:59 -00:35 | 40:54 -00:58 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 45:20 | 04:58 +00:20 | 46:53 -01:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 50:38 | 05:49 -00:23 | 51:51 -01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 56:04 | 02:21 -00:02 | 57:40 -01:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 58:23 | 05:48 -00:31 | 01:00:01 -01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 | 01:03:40 | 05:39 -00:59 | 01:05:49 -02:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:38 | 01:08:20 | 06:36 +00:02 | 01:11:28 -03:08 |
| Wall Balls | 07:20 | 01:14:58 | 07:20 +00:00 | 01:18:04 -03:06 |
| Roxzone | 11:03 | 01:33:13 | 07:49 +03:14 | 01:33:13 |
Michael Burns delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 768 out of 1801 athletes, placing him in the top 42% overall and within his age group. His total running time of 43:26 was notably faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his pacing suggests he started slightly slower, as evidenced by his Running 1 time, but quickly found his rhythm, maintaining a strong pace in subsequent running segments. Given his performance, Michael demonstrates a hybrid profile with a skew towards running prowess, yet there remains room for improvement in strength-based exercises and transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kampanatkosol Richard | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:33:27 | |
| Pruban Michael | 2023 Hamburg | 01:33:02 | |
| Soto Eduardo | 2023 Chicago | 01:33:35 | |
| Hammond Timothy | 2023 London | 01:33:30 | |
| Taffard Simon | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:32:55 | |
| Walker Zach | 2023 Dallas | 01:33:13 | |
| Makhlin Alex | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:03 | |
| Meslier Yann | 2024 Marseille | 01:33:07 | |
| Clowes Christopher | 2024 Manchester | 01:33:21 | |
| Mcloughlin Daire | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
