Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 970 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Graeme's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Graeme's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Graeme's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Graeme's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:17 | 55:02 to 49:45 | 66.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:37 | 09:33 to 06:56 | 33.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:47 to 02:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:21 to 06:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:49 to 07:49 | 0.0% |
| Smith Graeme | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 05:16 -01:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 03:35 | 04:43 -00:26 | 05:16 -01:41 |
| Running 2 | 06:47 | 07:52 | 05:47 +01:00 | 09:59 -02:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:47 | 14:39 | 03:37 -00:50 | 15:46 -01:07 |
| Running 3 | 07:29 | 17:26 | 06:25 +01:04 | 19:23 -01:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:04 | 24:55 | 06:13 -02:09 | 25:48 -00:53 |
| Running 4 | 07:36 | 28:59 | 06:22 +01:14 | 32:01 -03:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:33 | 36:35 | 07:05 +02:28 | 38:23 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 08:05 | 46:08 | 06:39 +01:26 | 45:28 +00:40 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 54:13 | 05:15 -00:08 | 52:07 +02:06 |
| Running 6 | 07:49 | 59:20 | 06:29 +01:20 | 57:22 +01:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 01:07:09 | 02:38 -00:24 | 01:03:51 +03:18 |
| Running 7 | 07:36 | 01:09:23 | 06:27 +01:09 | 01:06:29 +02:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:21 | 01:16:59 | 06:39 -00:18 | 01:12:56 +04:03 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:23:20 | 07:40 -01:32 | 01:19:35 +03:45 |
| Wall Balls | 07:49 | 01:29:28 | 08:40 -00:51 | 01:27:15 +02:13 |
| Roxzone | 07:59 | 01:45:09 | 09:14 -01:15 | 01:45:09 |
Graeme Smith demonstrated a commendable effort during the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race. He ranked in the top 58% of both his age group and overall athletes, indicating a balanced performance. However, his overall time was slower than average, particularly in the total running time segment, where he was 3 minutes and 42 seconds slower than average. This suggests Graeme has a strength-oriented profile rather than a runner profile. A closer look at his splits reveals that he started the race significantly faster than average in the first running segment but his pace dropped in the subsequent running segments. This indicates a possible issue with pacing and endurance over the course of the race.
Considering Graeme's performance, a few race strategies could be beneficial:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moreau Cyrian | 2024 Paris | 01:45:15 | |
| Esman Floris | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:45:07 | |
| Lehmberg Andreas | 2022 Hamburg | 01:44:47 | |
| Sundahl Johan | 2024 Malaga | 01:45:35 | |
| Price Rhys | 2022 Birmingham | 01:45:12 | |
| Kezic Mario | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:45:04 | |
| Miros Radoslaw | 2024 Gdansk | 01:45:31 | |
| Bridges Billy | 2024 Dallas | 01:44:49 | |
| Ro Bronson | 2023 Singapore | 01:45:27 | |
| Bagge John | 2023 New York | 01:45:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
