Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 596 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pasterkamp Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pasterkamp Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pasterkamp Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pasterkamp Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:59 | 01:06:02 to 53:03 | 95.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 08:21 to 07:41 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:24 to 07:24 | 0.0% |
| Pasterkamp Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 05:36 -01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 03:58 | 04:51 -00:08 | 05:36 -01:38 |
| Running 2 | 08:30 | 08:41 | 06:13 +02:17 | 10:27 -01:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 17:11 | 03:49 -01:04 | 16:40 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 08:42 | 19:56 | 07:01 +01:41 | 20:29 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:50 | 28:38 | 06:45 -00:55 | 27:30 +01:08 |
| Running 4 | 08:45 | 34:28 | 06:55 +01:50 | 34:15 +00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:21 | 43:13 | 07:51 +00:30 | 41:10 +02:03 |
| Running 5 | 09:04 | 51:34 | 07:17 +01:47 | 49:01 +02:33 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 01:00:38 | 05:24 -00:19 | 56:18 +04:20 |
| Running 6 | 08:47 | 01:05:43 | 06:57 +01:50 | 01:01:42 +04:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:14:30 | 02:51 -00:53 | 01:08:39 +05:51 |
| Running 7 | 08:48 | 01:16:28 | 07:01 +01:47 | 01:11:30 +04:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:20 | 01:25:16 | 07:22 -02:02 | 01:18:31 +06:45 |
| Running 8 | 09:32 | 01:30:36 | 08:37 +00:55 | 01:25:53 +04:43 |
| Wall Balls | 07:24 | 01:40:08 | 09:35 -02:11 | 01:34:30 +05:38 |
| Roxzone | 06:59 | 01:54:23 | 10:18 -03:19 | 01:54:23 |
Daniel Pasterkamp demonstrated a solid overall performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, placing in the top 66% overall and within the top 61% in his age group. His strength was evident in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, where he consistently performed faster than average. However, his running segments lagged behind, with a total running time that was 10:08 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency and endurance. Daniel's initial segment (Running 1) was exceptionally fast, suggesting he may have started the race too quickly, which could have led to fatigue in later segments. His overall profile leans towards strength, with room for improvement in running capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martinez Victor | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:54:32 | |
| Walther Oliver | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:54:18 | |
| Stewart Darryl | 2024 Hamburg | 01:53:57 | |
| Novales Hugo | 2024 Singapore | 01:54:06 | |
| Sidaway Adam | 2022 Birmingham | 01:54:04 | |
| Preston Lee | 2022 Manchester | 01:54:39 | |
| Buchenthal Andreas | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:54:28 | |
| Kuoch Jerome | 2023 Paris | 01:53:58 | |
| Saeed Nabil | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:54:15 | |
| Hericher Théo | 2023 Paris | 01:54:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
