Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Palmer Daryl's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Palmer Daryl's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Palmer Daryl's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Palmer Daryl's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:32 | 08:44 to 07:12 | 34.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:05 | 06:28 to 05:23 | 24.5% |
| Run Total | 00:44 | 46:36 to 45:52 | 16.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:41 | 06:19 to 05:38 | 15.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:51 to 04:35 | 6.0% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:06 to 04:59 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:58 to 05:58 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Palmer Daryl | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:57 | 00:00 | 04:57 -01:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 03:57 | 04:35 +00:16 | 04:57 -01:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 08:48 | 05:23 +00:07 | 09:32 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 14:18 | 03:12 -00:05 | 14:55 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 17:25 | 05:51 -00:05 | 18:07 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 06:28 | 23:11 | 05:33 +00:55 | 23:58 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:53 | 29:39 | 05:52 +00:01 | 29:31 +00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:58 | 35:32 | 06:15 -00:17 | 35:23 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 41:30 | 06:06 -00:06 | 41:38 -00:08 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 47:30 | 05:03 +00:03 | 47:44 -00:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:15 | 52:36 | 05:53 +00:22 | 52:47 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 58:51 | 02:25 -00:11 | 58:40 +00:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:18 | 01:01:05 | 05:53 +00:25 | 01:01:05 +00:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:19 | 01:07:23 | 05:52 +00:27 | 01:06:58 +00:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:59 | 01:13:42 | 06:50 +00:09 | 01:12:50 +00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 08:44 | 01:20:41 | 07:34 +01:10 | 01:19:40 +01:01 |
| Roxzone | 06:04 | 01:35:22 | 08:08 -02:04 | 01:35:22 |
Daryl Palmer delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, ranking 408th overall and 36th in his age group. His total running time was 33 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, the initial running segments suggest he started the race a bit too fast, particularly with Running 1 being significantly faster than average. This might have affected his stamina in later segments. His transitions in the Roxzone were exceptionally efficient, reflecting good overall fitness and transition skills.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis David | 2024 London | 01:35:45 | |
| Tan Mackenzie | 2023 Singapore | 01:35:27 | |
| Duzhnikov Pavel | 2024 Sydney | 01:35:32 | |
| Ashworth Chris | 2022 Manchester | 01:35:00 | |
| Pearce James | 2024 Dublin | 01:35:01 | |
| Kruissen Lars | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:40 | |
| Fale Daniel | 2024 Brisbane | 01:35:09 | |
| Thomassen Willem | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:35:05 | |
| Hugeri Marco | 2023 Wien | 01:34:59 | |
| Schroeder Dustin | 2024 Hamburg | 01:35:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
