Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nicholson Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nicholson Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nicholson Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nicholson Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:37 | 07:12 to 05:35 | 35.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:10 | 05:39 to 04:29 | 25.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:02 | 05:36 to 04:34 | 22.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 02:57 to 02:31 | 9.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:29 to 04:17 | 4.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 04:26 to 04:19 | 2.6% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:11 to 39:11 | 0.0% |
| Nicholson Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:57 | 00:00 | 04:27 -01:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 02:57 | 04:23 +00:06 | 04:27 -01:30 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:26 | 04:45 +00:10 | 08:50 -01:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 12:21 | 02:45 +00:12 | 13:35 -01:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 15:18 | 05:09 +00:19 | 16:20 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 20:46 | 04:39 -00:13 | 21:29 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 25:12 | 05:07 +00:09 | 26:08 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 30:28 | 04:57 +00:39 | 31:15 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 36:04 | 05:17 +00:17 | 36:12 -00:08 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 41:38 | 04:43 -00:06 | 41:29 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 46:15 | 05:10 +00:15 | 46:12 +00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 51:40 | 02:05 -00:24 | 51:22 +00:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 53:21 | 05:08 +00:16 | 53:27 -00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:39 | 58:45 | 04:49 +00:50 | 58:35 +00:10 |
| Running 8 | 04:15 | 01:04:24 | 05:39 -01:24 | 01:03:24 +01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 07:12 | 01:08:39 | 06:03 +01:09 | 01:09:03 -00:24 |
| Roxzone | 05:41 | 01:21:26 | 06:20 -00:39 | 01:21:26 |
Steven Nicholson delivered a respectable performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX, ranking in the top 54% of all athletes and top 60% in his age group. He demonstrated strong running capabilities, with his total running time being 01:46 faster than the average. He started the race exceptionally well, his time for Running 1 being significantly faster than average, placing him in the top 1 percentile. Despite some slowdowns in the midsections of the race, he regained momentum towards the end, with a strong finish in Running 8. His performance indicates a strong runner profile, but his strength segments show room for improvement.
Steven should consider a more measured start to conserve energy for the middle sections of the race, where he tends to slow down. He should also focus on efficient transitions between running and strength segments to minimize wasted time. Given his running strength, he may be able to use the running segments as recovery periods by maintaining a consistent but slightly slower pace. This strategy would allow him to tackle the strength segments with more energy, potentially improving his overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morais Carlos | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:58 | |
| Torracchi Federico | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:07 | |
| Seewald Christopher | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:21:21 | |
| West Brodie | 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:25 | |
| Timcke Shaun | 2023 London | 01:21:24 | |
| Lippai Georg | 2023 Wien | 01:21:27 | |
| Dancau Max | 2022 Berlin | 01:21:55 | |
| Mccartney Shaun | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:29 | |
| Sanmori' Cristian | 2024 Milan | 01:21:37 | |
| Birkholz Arthur | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:21:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
