Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mclaughlin Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mclaughlin Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mclaughlin Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mclaughlin Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:19 | 07:13 to 05:54 | 50.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 | 08:10 to 07:05 | 41.4% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:07 to 04:57 | 6.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 05:36 to 05:33 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:18 to 44:18 | 0.0% |
| Mclaughlin Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:34 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 05:34 | 04:35 -00:17 | 04:56 +00:38 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 09:52 | 05:23 -00:35 | 09:31 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 14:40 | 03:11 -00:46 | 14:54 -00:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 17:05 | 05:53 -00:45 | 18:05 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:16 | 22:13 | 05:31 -01:15 | 23:58 -01:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 26:29 | 05:52 -00:28 | 29:29 -03:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:13 | 31:53 | 06:09 +01:04 | 35:21 -03:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 39:06 | 06:04 -00:13 | 41:30 -02:24 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 44:57 | 05:01 +00:06 | 47:34 -02:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 50:04 | 05:53 -00:24 | 52:35 -02:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 55:33 | 02:24 -00:34 | 58:28 -02:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 57:23 | 05:52 -00:24 | 01:00:52 -03:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:02:51 | 05:45 -00:09 | 01:06:44 -03:53 |
| Running 8 | 06:40 | 01:08:27 | 06:44 -00:04 | 01:12:29 -04:02 |
| Wall Balls | 08:10 | 01:15:07 | 07:25 +00:45 | 01:19:13 -04:06 |
| Roxzone | 11:30 | 01:34:37 | 07:59 +03:31 | 01:34:37 |
Kevin Mclaughlin, in the Hyrox Birmingham event, put up an exceptional performance, finishing in the top 47% of both his age group and overall. A robust analysis of his performance indicates a strong inclination towards running with a total running time of 00:44:18, which is 02:35 faster than the average. There are indications of a well-paced race strategy, as observed from his consistent improvement in running times from Running 1 to Running 4. However, Kevin seems to lose momentum in the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, and Wall Balls segments, indicating areas for potential improvement.
For improved race performance, Kevin should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron James | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:40 | |
| Penfound Jack | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:41 | |
| Hartwich Jens | 2024 Berlin | 01:34:21 | |
| Sharlott Matt | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:08 | |
| Eves Christopher | 2022 London | 01:34:52 | |
| Ignacio Ray | 2021 Chicago | 01:34:59 | |
| Meldrum Chris | 2022 London | 01:34:27 | |
| Frey Vincent | 2019 Leipzig | 01:34:35 | |
| Polatajko Michael | 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:35 | |
| Reason Dan | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
