Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lieshout Guus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lieshout Guus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lieshout Guus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lieshout Guus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:06 | 46:46 to 42:40 | 75.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:50 | 06:04 to 05:14 | 15.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 05:17 to 04:49 | 8.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Lieshout Guus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:49 | 04:29 -00:18 | 04:41 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 08:00 | 05:04 +00:28 | 09:10 -01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 13:32 | 02:59 -00:33 | 14:14 -00:42 |
| Running 3 | 06:19 | 15:58 | 05:31 +00:48 | 17:13 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 22:17 | 05:05 +00:12 | 22:44 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:21 | 27:34 | 05:29 +00:52 | 27:49 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 33:55 | 05:33 +00:31 | 33:18 +00:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:23 | 39:59 | 05:41 +00:42 | 38:51 +01:08 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 46:22 | 04:52 -00:05 | 44:32 +01:50 |
| Running 6 | 05:38 | 51:09 | 05:32 +00:06 | 49:24 +01:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 56:47 | 02:14 -00:24 | 54:56 +01:51 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 58:37 | 05:31 +00:22 | 57:10 +01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:28 | 01:04:30 | 05:17 -00:49 | 01:02:41 +01:49 |
| Running 8 | 06:55 | 01:08:58 | 06:09 +00:46 | 01:07:58 +01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 04:20 | 01:15:53 | 06:46 -02:26 | 01:14:07 +01:46 |
| Roxzone | 07:52 | 01:27:57 | 07:04 +00:48 | 01:27:57 |
However, there are areas where Guus can improve his performance. His total running time of 00:46:46 was 04:53 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in his running abilities. His best running lap of 00:03:49 was faster than average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in this area.
In conclusion, Guus Lieshout showed great potential in the 2023 Amsterdam Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, reducing transition time, and implementing effective race strategies, Guus can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Viklinder Daniel | 2024 Stockholm | 01:28:19 | |
| Kodjayan Luis | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:12 | |
| Lahl Thomas | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:27:55 | |
| Sakansky Brian | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:27:29 | |
| Schlagwein Robin | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:11 | |
| Marshment Jordan | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:26 | |
| Foley David | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:48 | |
| Smith Mike | 2023 London | 01:28:05 | |
| Voets Daan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:49 | |
| Roa Eric | 2021 Austin | 01:28:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
