Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 616 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Keogh Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Keogh Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Keogh Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Keogh Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:29 | 56:32 to 53:03 | 36.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 03:15 | 06:09 to 02:54 | 33.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:27 | 10:08 to 07:41 | 25.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 09:45 to 09:20 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:38 to 03:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Keogh Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:03 | 00:00 | 05:28 -01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 04:03 | 04:51 -00:27 | 05:28 -01:25 |
| Running 2 | 07:19 | 08:27 | 06:12 +01:07 | 10:19 -01:52 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 15:46 | 03:53 -00:15 | 16:31 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 07:38 | 19:24 | 06:58 +00:40 | 20:24 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 27:02 | 06:48 -01:31 | 27:22 -00:20 |
| Running 4 | 07:54 | 32:19 | 06:55 +00:59 | 34:10 -01:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:08 | 40:13 | 07:48 +02:20 | 41:05 -00:52 |
| Running 5 | 08:03 | 50:21 | 07:17 +00:46 | 48:53 +01:28 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 58:24 | 05:24 -00:21 | 56:10 +02:14 |
| Running 6 | 07:41 | 01:03:27 | 07:00 +00:41 | 01:01:34 +01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 06:09 | 01:11:08 | 02:49 +03:20 | 01:08:34 +02:34 |
| Running 7 | 08:17 | 01:17:17 | 07:01 +01:16 | 01:11:23 +05:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:19 | 01:25:34 | 07:20 -01:01 | 01:18:24 +07:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:31:53 | 08:37 -02:58 | 01:25:44 +06:09 |
| Wall Balls | 09:45 | 01:37:32 | 09:36 +00:09 | 01:34:21 +03:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:51 | 01:54:01 | 10:04 -03:13 | 01:54:01 |
Ian Keogh showcased a commendable performance at the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race. Ian was able to secure a position in the top 62% of 2696 athletes overall and stood in the top 65% of his age category (30-34). His overall time was 01:54:01, with a total running time of 00:56:32, which was marginally slower (01:02) than the average.
He demonstrated a great start in the race, with Running 1 and Ski Erg segments significantly faster than the average. However, as the race progressed, his running times started to lag, suggesting he might have started a bit too fast. Ian's strength lies in his ability to perform well in strength-based exercises such as the Ski Erg and Sled Pull.
His finishing segments, including Sandbag Lunges and Running 8, were performed exceptionally well, indicating his ability to preserve energy for the final push. Ian's Roxzone time was considerably faster than the average, suggesting good overall fitness and quick transitions.
The following strategies could be implemented during the race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Limbani Hiran | 2023 London | 01:53:36 | |
| Luckiewicz Kyle | 2023 Anaheim | 01:54:29 | |
| Gazzola Christopher | 2024 New York | 01:53:58 | |
| Ninnis David | 2023 Melbourne | 01:53:45 | |
| Ip Tat Yeung | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:54:03 | |
| Müller Markus | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:54:23 | |
| Hanot Gonzague | 2023 Paris | 01:53:33 | |
| Gilmartin Gary | 2024 Dublin | 01:53:32 | |
| Qureshi Balal | 2024 Paris | 01:53:50 | |
| Moreno Marco | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:54:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
