Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Goudsmits Emiel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Goudsmits Emiel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Goudsmits Emiel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Goudsmits Emiel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:55 | 47:23 to 44:28 | 56.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:06 | 06:14 to 05:08 | 21.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 | 04:59 to 04:31 | 9.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:23 | 06:03 to 05:40 | 7.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 07:03 to 06:49 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:16 to 02:14 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Goudsmits Emiel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 04:49 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 04:04 | 04:33 +00:26 | 04:49 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:48 | 09:03 | 05:19 +00:29 | 09:22 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 14:51 | 03:08 -00:41 | 14:41 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 17:18 | 05:47 +00:08 | 17:49 -00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 06:14 | 23:13 | 05:23 +00:51 | 23:36 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 29:27 | 05:46 +00:30 | 28:59 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 35:43 | 05:59 +00:04 | 34:45 +00:58 |
| Running 5 | 06:16 | 41:46 | 05:58 +00:18 | 40:44 +01:02 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 48:02 | 04:58 -00:12 | 46:42 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 06:27 | 52:48 | 05:48 +00:39 | 51:40 +01:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 59:15 | 02:22 -00:06 | 57:28 +01:47 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:01:31 | 05:46 +00:35 | 59:50 +01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:04 | 01:07:52 | 05:36 -00:32 | 01:05:36 +02:16 |
| Running 8 | 06:19 | 01:12:56 | 06:33 -00:14 | 01:11:12 +01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 07:03 | 01:19:15 | 07:14 -00:11 | 01:17:45 +01:30 |
| Roxzone | 06:29 | 01:32:40 | 07:41 -01:12 | 01:32:40 |
Pacing and Profile:
Emiel's pacing throughout the race was generally consistent, with some segments performed faster than average and others slower. It is worth noting that his total running time (00:47:23) was 03:15 slower than average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. This suggests that he may need to focus on both his running and strength training.
By addressing these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Emiel Goudsmits can enhance his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kasanmonadi Roan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:49 | |
| Santacroce Andrea | 2023 Paris | 01:32:43 | |
| Trojer Fabian | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:32:21 | |
| Henien Martin | 2024 New York | 01:32:26 | |
| Smith Andy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:49 | |
| Lowe Alan | 2024 Poznan | 01:32:45 | |
| Esparza Vicente | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:32:22 | |
| Rashid Hamad Yousef | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:32:29 | |
| Bignell Joe | 2023 London | 01:32:44 | |
| Bourne Antoine | 2024 Paris | 01:33:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
