Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Stockholm using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Darby Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Darby Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Darby Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Darby Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:44 | 46:27 to 43:43 | 70.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:28 | 03:24 to 02:56 | 12.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 05:44 to 05:29 | 6.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 06:47 to 06:36 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:58 to 04:51 | 3.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:18 to 02:11 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:30 to 04:29 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Darby Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:22 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:22 | 04:31 -00:01 | 04:45 -00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 08:52 | 05:08 -00:14 | 09:16 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 03:24 | 13:46 | 03:05 +00:19 | 14:24 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 17:10 | 05:37 +00:26 | 17:29 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 23:13 | 05:15 -00:20 | 23:06 +00:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 28:08 | 05:36 +00:38 | 28:21 -00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:44 | 34:22 | 05:45 -00:01 | 33:57 +00:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 40:06 | 05:47 +00:16 | 39:42 +00:24 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 46:09 | 04:55 +00:03 | 45:29 +00:40 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 51:07 | 05:37 +00:11 | 50:24 +00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 56:55 | 02:17 +00:01 | 56:01 +00:54 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 59:13 | 05:36 +00:28 | 58:18 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 | 01:05:17 | 05:28 -00:48 | 01:03:54 +01:23 |
| Running 8 | 07:02 | 01:09:57 | 06:19 +00:43 | 01:09:22 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 06:47 | 01:16:59 | 06:58 -00:11 | 01:15:41 +01:18 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:30:06 | 07:27 -01:00 | 01:30:06 |
Michael's best running lap time was 00:04:22, which was 00:13 faster than the average. This indicates that he has potential in running and can maintain a good pace. However, his splits analysis shows that he lost time in several running segments, particularly Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises and drills, Michael can enhance his performance in the identified areas and improve his overall race results. It is important for him to tailor his training routine to address his specific weaknesses and capitalize on his strengths as a runner.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelucchi Mauro | 2024 Milan | 01:29:41 | |
| Rye Sveinung | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:28 | |
| Köppl Ulrich | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:30:30 | |
| Stadler Stefan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:29:43 | |
| Reckemeier Andreas | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:16 | |
| Krohn Johannes | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:05 | |
| Emanuele Vincent | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:30:23 | |
| Pahlow Jan | 2023 Hannover | 01:29:37 | |
| Tennet Jonny | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:46 | |
| Held Patrick | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:29:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
