Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cosio Maria's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cosio Maria's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cosio Maria's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cosio Maria's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:17 | 51:56 to 47:39 | 87.1% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:45 to 05:27 | 6.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:56 to 02:47 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:16 to 05:10 | 2.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 05:57 to 05:52 | 1.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:04 to 06:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Cosio Maria | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:46 | 00:00 | 05:23 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 05:46 | 05:13 +00:03 | 05:23 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 11:02 | 05:45 -00:13 | 10:36 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 16:34 | 02:53 +00:03 | 16:21 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 19:30 | 06:05 -00:27 | 19:14 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 05:57 | 25:08 | 06:09 -00:12 | 25:19 -00:11 |
| Running 4 | 10:12 | 31:05 | 06:05 +04:07 | 31:28 -00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 41:17 | 06:44 -00:40 | 37:33 +03:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 47:21 | 06:15 -00:22 | 44:17 +03:04 |
| Rowing | 05:45 | 53:14 | 05:30 +00:15 | 50:32 +02:42 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 58:59 | 06:08 -00:05 | 56:02 +02:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:05:02 | 02:23 -00:08 | 01:02:10 +02:52 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 01:07:17 | 06:06 +00:03 | 01:04:33 +02:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:35 | 01:13:26 | 05:11 -00:36 | 01:10:39 +02:47 |
| Running 8 | 06:47 | 01:18:01 | 06:38 +00:09 | 01:15:50 +02:11 |
| Wall Balls | 03:45 | 01:24:48 | 05:31 -01:46 | 01:22:28 +02:20 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:35:36 | 07:37 -00:28 | 01:35:36 |
Based on the splits analysis, Maria performed relatively well in some segments, such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, Wall Balls, and Roxzone, where she was faster than the average time. However, there were areas where she could improve, particularly in the Running 4, Running 1, and Rowing segments, where she lost significant time compared to the average.
Overall, Maria Cosio has demonstrated strong potential in the Hyrox race. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, focusing on improving her weakest segments, and adopting effective race strategies, Maria can enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Talarczyk Cara | 2023 Glasgow | 01:35:19 | |
| Dow Josephine | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:25 | |
| Mankowska Magdalena | 2024 Gdansk | 01:36:01 | |
| Blackford Lois | 2023 London | 01:35:32 | |
| Turtl Imelda | 2024 Milan | 01:36:04 | |
| Kime Landi | 2022 Dallas | 01:35:48 | |
| Schörg Verena | 2022 Wien | 01:35:51 | |
| Tofilska Jadwiga | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:58 | |
| Teall Charlotte | 2022 Birmingham | 01:35:32 | |
| Sheth Natasha | 2022 London | 01:35:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Anaheim | 01:34:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
