Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Turtl Imelda's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Turtl Imelda's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Turtl Imelda's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Turtl Imelda's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:24 | 08:18 to 05:54 | 43.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:13 | 06:15 to 05:02 | 21.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:51 | 03:40 to 02:49 | 15.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 06:51 to 06:30 | 6.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:20 | 05:28 to 05:08 | 6.0% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:42 to 05:27 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:19 to 05:11 | 2.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:18 to 02:17 | 0.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:08 to 44:08 | 0.0% |
| Turtl Imelda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:39 | 00:00 | 05:24 +01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:19 | 06:39 | 05:14 +00:05 | 05:24 +01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:22 | 11:58 | 05:46 -00:24 | 10:38 +01:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:40 | 17:20 | 02:55 +00:45 | 16:24 +00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 21:00 | 06:05 -00:46 | 19:19 +01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 08:18 | 26:19 | 06:13 +02:05 | 25:24 +00:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 34:37 | 06:06 -00:33 | 31:37 +03:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:51 | 40:10 | 06:50 +00:01 | 37:43 +02:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 47:01 | 06:15 -00:44 | 44:33 +02:28 |
| Rowing | 05:42 | 52:32 | 05:31 +00:11 | 50:48 +01:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 58:14 | 06:09 -00:36 | 56:19 +01:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 01:03:47 | 02:25 -00:07 | 01:02:28 +01:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 01:06:05 | 06:08 -00:38 | 01:04:53 +01:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:15 | 01:11:35 | 05:13 +01:02 | 01:11:01 +00:34 |
| Running 8 | 04:45 | 01:17:50 | 06:41 -01:56 | 01:16:14 +01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:28 | 01:22:35 | 05:31 -00:03 | 01:22:55 -00:20 |
| Roxzone | 08:09 | 01:36:04 | 07:38 +00:31 | 01:36:04 |
Imelda Turtl showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, with an overall rank of 349 among 2043 athletes, placing her in the top 17%. This is an excellent achievement, particularly considering her age group (50-54). Her overall time was 01:36:04, which is noteworthy for her category.
Imelda's running times were exceptional, with her total running time being 00:44:08, which is 04:50 faster than the average. This highlights her strong running ability. However, her first running segment was slower than average, suggesting that she may have started off too slow. In contrast, her last running segment was significantly faster than average, suggesting a strong finish.
She seems to have a runner profile, excelling in the running segments. However, this points towards a need for improvement in strength-based exercises and transitions, as suggested by her roxzone time being slower than average.
For improved performance in future races, Imelda should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Jennifer | 2018 Leipzig | 01:35:38 | |
| Begum Fatema | 2024 London | 01:35:53 | |
| Dziak Marta | 2024 Dallas | 01:36:28 | |
| Cobo Moreno Eva | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:31 | |
| Levermann Wibke | 2021 Berlin | 01:35:37 | |
| Ferguson Cassandra | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:47 | |
| Craig Diana | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:04 | |
| Cleland Sara | 2022 Chicago | 01:36:03 | |
| Lagos Fotini | 2019 New York | 01:36:12 | |
| Borders Caitlin | 2024 London | 01:35:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
