Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bristow Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bristow Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bristow Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bristow Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:41 | 08:23 to 06:42 | 46.8% |
| Run Total | 00:36 | 49:26 to 48:50 | 16.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 04:03 to 03:29 | 15.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:16 | 08:21 to 08:05 | 7.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 06:27 to 06:13 | 6.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 06:05 to 05:57 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:16 to 05:09 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Bristow Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 05:13 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:43 | 04:42 +00:00 | 05:13 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 09:25 | 05:43 -00:19 | 09:55 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 04:03 | 14:49 | 03:30 +00:33 | 15:38 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 06:23 | 18:52 | 06:16 +00:07 | 19:08 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 06:05 | 25:15 | 06:06 -00:01 | 25:24 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 06:54 | 31:20 | 06:16 +00:38 | 31:30 -00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:23 | 38:14 | 06:56 +01:27 | 37:46 +00:28 |
| Running 5 | 06:23 | 46:37 | 06:32 -00:09 | 44:42 +01:55 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 53:00 | 05:12 +00:04 | 51:14 +01:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:20 | 58:16 | 06:21 -00:01 | 56:26 +01:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 01:04:36 | 02:36 -00:22 | 01:02:47 +01:49 |
| Running 7 | 06:44 | 01:06:50 | 06:19 +00:25 | 01:05:23 +01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:27 | 01:13:34 | 06:24 +00:03 | 01:11:42 +01:52 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:20:01 | 07:26 -00:47 | 01:18:06 +01:55 |
| Wall Balls | 08:21 | 01:26:40 | 08:21 +00:00 | 01:25:32 +01:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:42:56 | 09:03 -01:02 | 01:42:56 |
Andrew's best running lap was 00:04:43, indicating that he has strong running abilities. However, his overall running performance was slower than average, suggesting that he could benefit from additional training in this area. His splits analysis reveals that he performed particularly well in Running 1, Running 2, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Running 8, where he was faster than average. On the other hand, he struggled in Burpees Broad Jump, Running 4, Running 7, Sled Push, and Roxzone, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises and training techniques, Andrew can enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement and further excel in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Watson Kyle | 2024 Glasgow | 01:42:45 | |
| Murray Stuart | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:21 | |
| Quan Ronald | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:42:49 | |
| Owen Doug | 2024 Manchester | 01:42:58 | |
| Gillot JeanCharles | 2024 Marseille | 01:42:41 | |
| Martinez Enrique | 2024 Dallas | 01:42:55 | |
| Pauthier Claude | 2024 Marseille | 01:43:00 | |
| Aureli Daniele | 2024 Milan | 01:42:45 | |
| De Vries Bart | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:43:24 | |
| Shapiro Ian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:42:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 Dallas | 01:30:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
