Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brazier Mathew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brazier Mathew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brazier Mathew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brazier Mathew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:15 | 40:19 to 39:04 | 56.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:32 | 05:57 to 05:25 | 24.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:01 to 01:52 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:22 to 04:15 | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 04:17 to 04:12 | 3.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 04:28 to 04:25 | 2.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 04:23 to 04:22 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Brazier Mathew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:46 | 00:00 | 04:21 +01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 05:46 | 04:21 +00:01 | 04:21 +01:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 10:08 | 04:41 +00:07 | 08:42 +01:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 14:56 | 02:42 -00:17 | 13:23 +01:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 17:21 | 05:05 -00:05 | 16:05 +01:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:17 | 22:21 | 04:31 -00:14 | 21:10 +01:11 |
| Running 4 | 04:52 | 26:38 | 05:04 -00:12 | 25:41 +00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:28 | 31:30 | 04:48 -00:20 | 30:45 +00:45 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 35:58 | 05:12 -00:13 | 35:33 +00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 40:57 | 04:40 -00:08 | 40:45 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 45:29 | 05:05 -00:08 | 45:25 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 50:26 | 02:02 -00:01 | 50:30 -00:04 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 52:27 | 05:04 -00:10 | 52:32 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:23 | 57:21 | 04:39 -00:16 | 57:36 -00:15 |
| Running 8 | 05:05 | 01:01:44 | 05:33 -00:28 | 01:02:15 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 05:57 | 01:06:49 | 05:52 +00:05 | 01:07:48 -00:59 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:19:44 | 06:04 +01:01 | 01:19:44 |
Mathew Brazier exhibited a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. He finished within the top 22% of all participants and within the top 11% of his age group. This indicates a high level of fitness and competitiveness. However, there are areas that Mathew can work on to improve his overall timing and rank.
Interestingly, Mathew's total running time was only 3 seconds slower than the average, suggesting he is a balanced athlete with both running and strength capabilities. His pacing was quite good, with the exception of the first running segment where he started a bit slower than average. As the race progressed, Mathew seemed to pick up the pace and finished the running segments faster than average.
Mathew could benefit from implementing the following strategies during his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cornely David | 2022 Essen | 01:19:58 | |
| Denton Miles | 2023 London | 01:19:20 | |
| Bloyce Tom | 2024 London | 01:19:15 | |
| Mesman Wietse | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:30 | |
| Kaminski Stephane | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:44 | |
| Turrioni Maurizio | 2023 Milan | 01:19:23 | |
| Johnson Christopher | 2023 Chicago | 01:19:36 | |
| Donoghue Mark | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:37 | |
| Rodríguez González Samuel | 2023 Bilbao | 01:19:42 | |
| Linares Muci Juan Carlos | 2022 Madrid | 01:20:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
