Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 370 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bowlin Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bowlin Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bowlin Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bowlin Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:40 | 01:04:31 to 54:51 | 99.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 03:03 to 03:01 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:25 to 06:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:02 to 07:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:20 to 08:20 | 0.0% |
| Bowlin Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:31 | 00:00 | 05:52 +00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 06:31 | 04:56 -00:12 | 05:52 +00:39 |
| Running 2 | 07:06 | 11:15 | 06:27 +00:39 | 10:48 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 04:06 | 18:21 | 04:02 +00:04 | 17:15 +01:06 |
| Running 3 | 07:49 | 22:27 | 07:15 +00:34 | 21:17 +01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 30:16 | 07:10 -01:28 | 28:32 +01:44 |
| Running 4 | 07:27 | 35:58 | 07:15 +00:12 | 35:42 +00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:25 | 43:25 | 08:20 -01:55 | 42:57 +00:28 |
| Running 5 | 08:38 | 49:50 | 07:38 +01:00 | 51:17 -01:27 |
| Rowing | 05:25 | 58:28 | 05:34 -00:09 | 58:55 -00:27 |
| Running 6 | 08:21 | 01:03:53 | 07:24 +00:57 | 01:04:29 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:03 | 01:12:14 | 02:57 +00:06 | 01:11:53 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 09:13 | 01:15:17 | 07:21 +01:52 | 01:14:50 +00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:02 | 01:24:30 | 07:55 -00:53 | 01:22:11 +02:19 |
| Running 8 | 09:29 | 01:31:32 | 09:24 +00:05 | 01:30:06 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 08:20 | 01:41:01 | 10:13 -01:53 | 01:39:30 +01:31 |
| Roxzone | 11:37 | 02:00:53 | 11:10 +00:27 | 02:00:53 |
Patrick Bowlin, despite being in the top 97% of athletes, shows potential for significant improvement. His overall time wasn't competitive compared to his peers in the 25-29 age group, and his total running time was noticeably slower than average. This suggests that Patrick is more of a strength athlete, as he performed well in strength-focused exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, and Wall Balls. However, his Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating that he took longer for transitions and recovery. His pacing seemed to be slower as well, especially in the first four running segments where he started slower than average.
Patrick should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bell David | 2023 Sydney | 02:00:25 | |
| Eilsøe Henrik | 2024 Hamburg | 02:01:02 | |
| Schmitt Torben | 2018 Hamburg | 02:00:26 | |
| Cordero Jose | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 02:00:37 | |
| Klöcker Andreas | 2023 Frankfurt | 02:00:46 | |
| Kelley James | 2023 Anaheim | 02:01:03 | |
| Vazquez Jose | 2024 Anaheim | 02:00:59 | |
| Arce Provencio Jorge Alberto | 2024 Mexico City | 02:00:46 | |
| Busby James | 2023 Los Angeles | 02:01:16 | |
| Van Asten Bart | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:00:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
