Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Elferen Tonny's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Elferen Tonny's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Elferen Tonny's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Elferen Tonny's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:21 | 52:48 to 45:27 | 83.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 07:22 to 05:54 | 16.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Van Elferen Tonny | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:21 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:58 | 05:21 | 04:35 -00:37 | 04:56 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 09:19 | 05:23 -00:07 | 09:31 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 14:35 | 03:11 -00:43 | 14:54 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 17:03 | 05:53 -00:13 | 18:05 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 02:39 | 22:43 | 05:31 -02:52 | 23:58 -01:15 |
| Running 4 | 06:08 | 25:22 | 05:52 +00:16 | 29:29 -04:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:22 | 31:30 | 06:09 +01:13 | 35:21 -03:51 |
| Running 5 | 07:20 | 38:52 | 06:04 +01:16 | 41:30 -02:38 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 46:12 | 05:01 -00:28 | 47:34 -01:22 |
| Running 6 | 09:53 | 50:45 | 05:53 +04:00 | 52:35 -01:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 01:00:38 | 02:24 -00:35 | 58:28 +02:10 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:02:27 | 05:52 +00:21 | 01:00:52 +01:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 01:08:40 | 05:45 -01:21 | 01:06:44 +01:56 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:13:04 | 06:44 +00:16 | 01:12:29 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 05:06 | 01:20:04 | 07:25 -02:19 | 01:19:13 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 09:32 | 01:34:37 | 07:59 +01:33 | 01:34:37 |
Tonny Van Elferen delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 1559, which places him in the top 50% overall and top 51% within his age group. His performance indicates a strong strength component, evidenced by superior times in strength-based events like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, all of which were significantly faster than average. However, his total running time was slower than average, suggesting a greater emphasis on strength over running capabilities. Additionally, the pacing strategy shows that Tonny started relatively fast but experienced a slowdown in the later runs, particularly in Running 5 and 6, indicating potential fatigue or endurance issues.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Finnigan Jonathan | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:03 | |
| Flinterman Ben | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:22 | |
| Samsel Mike | 2022 Dallas | 01:34:24 | |
| Zwaan Twan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:05 | |
| Bazemore Chris | 2024 Dallas | 01:34:26 | |
| Mollenhauer Eric | 2024 Hamburg | 01:34:26 | |
| Koch Chris | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:25 | |
| Wennemars Niels | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:34:21 | |
| Balbás Pérez Dani | 2022 Valencia | 01:35:00 | |
| Gregory Kym | 2023 Sydney | 01:34:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:39:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
