Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Skriver Jon's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Skriver Jon's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Skriver Jon's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Skriver Jon's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:07 | 04:50 to 03:43 | 30.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:07 | 05:49 to 04:42 | 30.6% |
| Run Total | 00:50 | 36:37 to 35:47 | 22.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 04:19 to 03:49 | 13.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:12 to 02:07 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:37 to 01:37 | 0.0% |
| Skriver Jon | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:05 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 04:15 | 04:14 -00:09 | 04:05 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:45 | 08:20 | 04:23 +01:22 | 08:19 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 14:05 | 02:30 -00:18 | 12:42 +01:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:19 | 16:17 | 04:42 -00:23 | 15:12 +01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 03:37 | 20:36 | 04:08 -00:31 | 19:54 +00:42 |
| Running 4 | 04:22 | 24:13 | 04:40 -00:18 | 24:02 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:50 | 28:35 | 04:12 +00:38 | 28:42 -00:07 |
| Running 5 | 04:28 | 33:25 | 04:48 -00:20 | 32:54 +00:31 |
| Rowing | 04:21 | 37:53 | 04:31 -00:10 | 37:42 +00:11 |
| Running 6 | 04:26 | 42:14 | 04:42 -00:16 | 42:13 +00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:37 | 46:40 | 01:52 -00:15 | 46:55 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 04:20 | 48:17 | 04:41 -00:21 | 48:47 -00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:19 | 52:37 | 04:11 +00:08 | 53:28 -00:51 |
| Running 8 | 04:45 | 56:56 | 05:01 -00:16 | 57:39 -00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 05:49 | 01:01:41 | 05:19 +00:30 | 01:02:40 -00:59 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:13:17 | 05:18 +00:37 | 01:13:17 |
Jon Skriver's performance at the 2024 Hamburg Hyrox event was commendable, as he ranked within the top 19% of the 823 athletes. In his age group (45-49), he ranked even higher, coming in at the top 14% of 78 athletes. His overall time was 01:13:17. His total running time was 00:36:37, which was 00:35 faster than the average. This suggests that Jon has a strong runner profile and his running segments played a significant role in his overall performance.
His pacing was inconsistent across the segments, with some segments being completed faster than the average, while others he took longer. Despite some slower segments, his prompt recovery and continued performance reflect well on his stamina and endurance.
Despite an overall impressive performance, there are a few segments where Jon can focus on for improvement. These include the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, and Sandbag Lunges.
To improve his overall race performance, Jon can focus on a few key strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Potinius Kristof | 2024 Hamburg | 01:13:30 | |
| Lawler Alex | 2024 Manchester | 01:13:30 | |
| Kukuk Christian | 2024 Poznan | 01:13:10 | |
| Abromeit Tim | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:13:41 | |
| Ras Tom | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:13:24 | |
| Bathurst Joe | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:13:26 | |
| Cobb Archie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:13:05 | |
| Fino Rui | 2024 Bilbao | 01:13:38 | |
| Waugh Pete | 2024 Glasgow | 01:13:03 | |
| Evans Dean | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:12:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
