Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nowack Anne's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nowack Anne's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nowack Anne's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nowack Anne's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:04 | 49:49 to 46:45 | 68.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:57 | 07:09 to 06:12 | 21.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:14 to 04:50 | 8.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 04:55 to 04:51 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Nowack Anne | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:35 | 00:00 | 05:15 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:58 | 05:35 | 05:11 -00:13 | 05:15 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 10:33 | 05:39 -00:13 | 10:26 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 15:59 | 02:53 -00:10 | 16:05 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 18:42 | 05:58 -00:09 | 18:58 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:25 | 24:31 | 06:03 -01:38 | 24:56 -00:25 |
| Running 4 | 06:03 | 28:56 | 05:59 +00:04 | 30:59 -02:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:09 | 34:59 | 06:35 +00:34 | 36:58 -01:59 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 42:08 | 06:10 +00:10 | 43:33 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 48:28 | 05:27 -00:20 | 49:43 -01:15 |
| Running 6 | 06:26 | 53:35 | 06:03 +00:23 | 55:10 -01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 01:00:01 | 02:21 -00:20 | 01:01:13 -01:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:32 | 01:02:02 | 06:03 +00:29 | 01:03:34 -01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:08:34 | 05:02 +00:12 | 01:09:37 -01:03 |
| Running 8 | 07:40 | 01:13:48 | 06:33 +01:07 | 01:14:39 -00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 04:55 | 01:21:28 | 05:14 -00:19 | 01:21:12 +00:16 |
| Roxzone | 07:27 | 01:33:43 | 07:17 +00:10 | 01:33:43 |
In terms of her splits analysis, Anne's total running time of 00:49:49 was 03:19 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she could focus on improving her overall fitness level and reducing transition times to enhance her performance in the roxzone. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:05:26 indicates that she has the potential to excel in running segments.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific training techniques and exercises, Anne can improve her overall performance in future Hyrox races. With her dedication and commitment, she has the potential to achieve even greater success in her age group and overall rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeeb Jiska | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:34:09 | |
| Topalovic Emma | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:26 | |
| Jasper Alex | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:29 | |
| Cadenas Lauren | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:33:24 | |
| Akkermans Lieke | 2024 Maastricht | 01:33:23 | |
| Hirst Athina | 2023 London | 01:33:28 | |
| Tonge Allana | 2023 Manchester | 01:33:56 | |
| Lloyd Emily | 2024 London | 01:34:01 | |
| Bi Nazia | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:49 | |
| Maughan Julie | 2024 Turin | 01:33:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Berlin | 01:33:00 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:48:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
