Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 317 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Meyer Yves's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Meyer Yves's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Meyer Yves's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Meyer Yves's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:52 | 48:23 to 42:31 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:42 to 02:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Meyer Yves | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:55 | 00:00 | 04:24 +01:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 05:55 | 04:20 -00:16 | 04:24 +01:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:37 | 09:59 | 04:54 +00:43 | 08:44 +01:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 15:36 | 04:20 -01:38 | 13:38 +01:58 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 18:18 | 05:28 +00:26 | 17:58 +00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 24:12 | 07:40 -02:57 | 23:26 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 28:55 | 05:28 +00:33 | 31:06 -02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:54 | 34:56 | 05:09 -00:15 | 36:34 -01:38 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 39:50 | 05:32 +00:37 | 41:43 -01:53 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 45:59 | 04:47 -00:15 | 47:15 -01:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 50:31 | 05:28 +00:22 | 52:02 -01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 56:21 | 02:36 -00:14 | 57:30 -01:09 |
| Running 7 | 06:08 | 58:43 | 05:31 +00:37 | 01:00:06 -01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 01:04:51 | 05:41 -00:01 | 01:05:37 -00:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:53 | 01:10:31 | 06:18 +00:35 | 01:11:18 -00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 04:12 | 01:17:24 | 07:54 -03:42 | 01:17:36 -00:12 |
| Roxzone | 11:18 | 01:32:45 | 07:15 +04:03 | 01:32:45 |
Yves Meyer, competing for Germany in the 35-39 age group, showed a commendable performance, ranking in the top 56% of all athletes and the top 63% within his age group. His overall time was 01:32:45. However, an area of concern is his total running time, which was slower than the average by 05:18. This indicates that Yves has a stronger performance in the strength segments, with his best running lap being 00:05:37.
His pacing seems to have been off, with the first four running segments slower than the average. This suggests that Yves might have started too slow and could not make up for the lost time during the later stages of the race.
With the identified areas of improvement, Yves should consider the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carmina Riccardo | 2023 Rimini | 01:32:43 | |
| Wijker Remie | 2023 Malaga | 01:32:44 | |
| Millner Travis | 2023 Houston | 01:32:47 | |
| Piccapietra Luca | 2024 Turin | 01:33:01 | |
| Ferdin Tony | 2024 Houston | 01:32:57 | |
| Mahl Markus | 2023 München | 01:33:08 | |
| Boland Brice | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:27 | |
| Martin John | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:14 | |
| Mariño Solís Alvaro | 2021 Madrid | 01:33:00 | |
| Wood Jason | 2019 New York | 01:32:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Köln | 01:10:56 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:09:17 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:15:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
