Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Asselt Pim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Asselt Pim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Asselt Pim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Asselt Pim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:46 | 50:29 to 43:43 | 96.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 05:39 to 05:29 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:36 to 04:29 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Van Asselt Pim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:32 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 06:32 | 04:31 +00:05 | 04:45 +01:47 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 11:08 | 05:08 +00:44 | 09:16 +01:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 17:00 | 03:05 -01:00 | 14:24 +02:36 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 19:05 | 05:37 +00:26 | 17:29 +01:36 |
| Sled Pull | 03:36 | 25:08 | 05:15 -01:39 | 23:06 +02:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 28:44 | 05:36 +00:34 | 28:21 +00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 34:54 | 05:45 -00:06 | 33:57 +00:57 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 40:33 | 05:47 +00:20 | 39:42 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 46:40 | 04:55 -00:29 | 45:29 +01:11 |
| Running 6 | 06:16 | 51:06 | 05:38 +00:38 | 50:24 +00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:43 | 57:22 | 02:17 -00:34 | 56:02 +01:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 59:05 | 05:37 +00:46 | 58:19 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:09 | 01:05:28 | 05:29 -00:20 | 01:03:56 +01:32 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:10:37 | 06:19 +00:50 | 01:09:25 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:17:46 | 06:59 -00:32 | 01:15:44 +02:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:30:11 | 07:28 -01:21 | 01:30:11 |
Pacing: Pim's pacing throughout the race was generally consistent, with some segments being slightly slower than average. However, it is important to note that his total running time was 07:21 slower than average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running speed and endurance.
Profile: Pim's profile leans more towards a runner, as his total running time was slower than average. To enhance his performance, he should incorporate more strength training exercises into his routine to improve overall fitness and transition times.
In conclusion, Pim Van Asselt had a solid performance in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race. To improve his performance in future races, he should focus on improving his running speed and endurance through specific training strategies such as interval training, strength training, and drills. By implementing these strategies and focusing on efficient transition times, Pim can enhance his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Tobias | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:30:10 | |
| Del Carlo Michael | 2024 Milan | 01:30:31 | |
| Göhringer Steve Austin | 2018 Hamburg | 01:30:40 | |
| Serzisko Tobias | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:30:34 | |
| Kühner Sebastian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:30:22 | |
| Thomas Gareth | 2023 Singapore | 01:29:55 | |
| Bagarello Nicola | 2024 Turin | 01:30:34 | |
| Muller Paul | 2024 Marseille | 01:30:18 | |
| Inderkum Martin | 2021 Berlin | 01:30:10 | |
| Blundell Ryan | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:41:57 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:42:43 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:38:11 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
