Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Leipzig using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schubert Maik's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schubert Maik's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schubert Maik's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schubert Maik's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:39 | 43:38 to 40:59 | 49.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:45 | 07:38 to 05:53 | 32.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 02:44 to 02:00 | 13.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 04:38 to 04:31 | 2.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 04:49 to 04:42 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:22 to 04:21 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Schubert Maik | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:12 | 04:24 -00:02 | 04:33 -00:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 08:34 | 04:53 +00:14 | 08:57 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 13:41 | 02:52 -00:53 | 13:50 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 15:40 | 05:18 +00:17 | 16:42 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 21:15 | 04:49 -00:11 | 22:00 -00:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 25:53 | 05:16 +00:20 | 26:49 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 31:29 | 05:08 -00:19 | 32:05 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 36:18 | 05:26 +00:08 | 37:13 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 41:52 | 04:46 -00:24 | 42:39 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 46:14 | 05:18 +00:19 | 47:25 -01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:44 | 51:51 | 02:09 +00:35 | 52:43 -00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 54:35 | 05:17 +00:22 | 54:52 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 01:00:14 | 04:58 -00:09 | 01:00:09 +00:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 01:05:03 | 05:51 +00:31 | 01:05:07 -00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:11:25 | 06:16 +01:22 | 01:10:58 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 04:57 | 01:23:52 | 06:38 -01:41 | 01:23:52 |
Looking at the splits analysis, Maik had some strong performances in certain segments, such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull, where he was faster than the average time. However, he struggled in segments like Wall Balls, Farmers Carry, and Running 8, where he was significantly slower than the average time.
Based on his splits, Maik seems to have a good balance between running and strength. His running segments were generally slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from more training in running. However, his overall running time was faster than the average, suggesting that he has a strong running profile compared to his peers.
Overall, Maik Schubert had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Leipzig. By focusing on improving his performance in the identified segments and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Christopher | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:18 | |
| Beck Alexander | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:23:47 | |
| Pérez Duran Manuel | 2023 Madrid | 01:24:16 | |
| Rappert Brian | 2023 Milan | 01:23:35 | |
| Gordon Graham Billy | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:44 | |
| Pye Stefan | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:10 | |
| Arnesano Daniele | 2024 Milan | 01:24:19 | |
| Robb Paul | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:20 | |
| Gallegos Brian | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:23:56 | |
| Simoes Terence | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Leipzig | 01:27:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
