Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:40 (From 07:25 to 05:45) | 37.0% |
| Sled Push | 01:14 (From 03:49 to 02:35) | 27.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 (From 05:03 to 04:37) | 9.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 (From 04:51 to 04:26) | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 (From 04:38 to 04:19) | 7.0% |
| Rowing | 00:19 (From 04:59 to 04:40) | 7.0% |
| BBJ | 00:07 (From 04:51 to 04:44) | 2.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:31 to 01:31) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 38:04 to 38:04) | 0.0% |
| Mota Pepe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 04:30 +00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 05:29 | 04:24 +00:14 | 04:30 +00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:26 | 10:07 | 04:51 -00:25 | 08:54 +01:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:49 | 14:33 | 02:51 +00:58 | 13:45 +00:48 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 18:22 | 05:14 -00:38 | 16:36 +01:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 22:58 | 04:46 +00:05 | 21:50 +01:08 |
| Running 4 | 04:43 | 27:49 | 05:13 -00:30 | 26:36 +01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:51 | 32:32 | 05:02 -00:11 | 31:49 +00:43 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 37:23 | 05:23 -00:38 | 36:51 +00:32 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 42:08 | 04:45 +00:14 | 42:14 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:35 | 47:07 | 05:15 -00:40 | 46:59 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:31 | 51:42 | 02:07 -00:36 | 52:14 -00:32 |
| Running 7 | 04:39 | 53:13 | 05:14 -00:35 | 54:21 -01:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:03 | 57:52 | 04:53 +00:10 | 59:35 -01:43 |
| Running 8 | 04:54 | 01:02:55 | 05:46 -00:52 | 01:04:28 -01:33 |
| Wall Balls | 07:25 | 01:07:49 | 06:14 +01:11 | 01:10:14 -02:25 |
| Roxzone | 07:52 | 01:22:59 | 06:31 +01:21 | 01:22:59 |
Pepe Mota's performance in the 2024 Madrid Hyrox race is commendable. His overall time of 01:22:59 places him in the top 28% of 1509 athletes, and within his age group of 60-64, he ranks third. This is a significant achievement. Pepe's total running time is 00:38:04, which is faster than average by 03:40, indicating that his running skills are a strong suit. As such, it seems Pepe has a runner profile, excelling in running segments more than strength exercises.
Examining the pacing in the initial segments of the race, it appears that Pepe started slower than average in the first running segment. However, he picked up speed in subsequent running segments and finished most of them faster than average, indicating a good strategy of conserving energy for the later stages of the race.
For better performance in future races, Pepe could consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grobecker Rickard | 2024 Stockholm | 01:23:02 | |
| Edwards Lee | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:50 | |
| Klose Julius | 2021 Hamburg | 01:22:35 | |
| Hann Anthony | 2024 London | 01:22:48 | |
| OConnell Cian | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:53 | |
| Mcevoy Brendan | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:10 | |
| Buuren Gino | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:35 | |
| Bjerregaard Rasmus | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:22:39 | |
| Lomholt Jonas | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:22:45 | |
| Davis Joseph | 2024 Anaheim | 01:22:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Bilbao Mota Pepe | 01:23:18 | |
| 2024 Malaga Mota Pepe | 01:26:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Mota Pepe
