Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verbeek Sven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verbeek Sven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verbeek Sven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verbeek Sven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:07 | 42:05 to 39:58 | 52.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:51 | 05:28 to 04:37 | 21.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 05:01 to 04:31 | 12.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 04:39 to 04:21 | 7.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:08 to 01:56 | 4.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:37 to 02:32 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Verbeek Sven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 04:30 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 04:52 | 04:23 -00:05 | 04:30 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 09:10 | 04:48 -00:02 | 08:53 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 13:56 | 02:46 -00:09 | 13:41 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 16:33 | 05:12 +00:34 | 16:27 +00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 22:19 | 04:41 -00:02 | 21:39 +00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 26:58 | 05:09 +00:01 | 26:20 +00:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:28 | 32:08 | 04:59 +00:29 | 31:29 +00:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:04 | 37:36 | 05:19 -00:15 | 36:28 +01:08 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 42:40 | 04:44 -00:19 | 41:47 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 47:05 | 05:12 +00:03 | 46:31 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 52:20 | 02:07 +00:01 | 51:43 +00:37 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 54:28 | 05:10 +00:02 | 53:50 +00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 59:40 | 04:51 +00:10 | 59:00 +00:40 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:04:41 | 05:42 +00:22 | 01:03:51 +00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:10:45 | 06:09 -01:01 | 01:09:33 +01:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:17 | 01:22:02 | 06:20 -00:03 | 01:22:02 |
One area of improvement is Sven's total running time, which was 02:42 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and his transition time between exercise zones. To improve this segment, Sven should focus on increasing his cardiovascular endurance and improving his agility and speed during transitions. Incorporating interval training, such as sprint intervals or shuttle runs, can help improve his overall running fitness. Additionally, practicing quick and efficient transitions between exercise zones can help him save valuable time during the race.
Another area to focus on is Sven's performance in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, where he was 00:50 slower than the average. To improve in this area, Sven should work on his explosive power and endurance. Incorporating exercises such as burpees, box jumps, and broad jumps into his training routine can help him develop the necessary strength and power for this segment. It may also be beneficial for Sven to practice pacing himself during the burpees, finding a rhythm that allows him to maintain a steady pace without burning out too quickly.
Sven also lost time in Running 3, Running 1, Best Lap, Running 8, and Sandbag Lunges segments. To improve in these areas, Sven should focus on both his running technique and his muscular endurance. Incorporating exercises to strengthen his lower body, such as squats, lunges, and calf raises, can help improve his running performance. Additionally, practicing proper running form, including maintaining an upright posture, using his arms efficiently, and landing with a midfoot strike, can help him run more efficiently and reduce the risk of injury.
Secondly, Sven should prioritize efficient transitions between exercise zones. Practicing these transitions during training can help him shave off valuable seconds during the race. He should aim to minimize the time spent in the roxzone, focusing on transitioning quickly and smoothly between exercises.
Lastly, Sven should listen to his body and adjust his effort level accordingly. If he feels fatigued during a particular segment, he should consider pacing himself slightly slower to ensure he can maintain a steady effort throughout the entire race.
Overall, Sven Verbeek had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to further enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transitioning efficiently, and targeting specific areas for improvement, Sven can continue to progress and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clemente Gonzalez Miguel | 2023 Valencia | 01:21:59 | |
| Plater Euan | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:49 | |
| Mcphillips Andrew | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:08 | |
| Parinello Nicolas | 2023 Paris | 01:22:15 | |
| Maßen Johannes | 2022 Hamburg | 01:21:55 | |
| Augustijn André | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:50 | |
| Vega Vergara Daniel | 2022 Valencia | 01:22:26 | |
| Kuperfils Victor | 2024 Paris | 01:21:44 | |
| Glober Camilo | 2021 Leipzig | 01:22:02 | |
| Banks David | 2023 Birmingham | 01:21:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:09:51 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:16:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
