Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sterma Alicja's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sterma Alicja's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sterma Alicja's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sterma Alicja's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:43 | 09:16 to 06:33 | 55.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:21 | 07:17 to 05:56 | 27.4% |
| Run Total | 00:49 | 48:49 to 48:00 | 16.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:15 to 05:12 | 1.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sterma Alicja | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 05:26 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:15 | 04:38 | 05:14 +00:01 | 05:26 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 09:53 | 05:46 -00:16 | 10:40 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 15:23 | 02:56 -00:12 | 16:26 -01:03 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 18:07 | 06:05 -00:05 | 19:22 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 07:17 | 24:07 | 06:15 +01:02 | 25:27 -01:20 |
| Running 4 | 06:48 | 31:24 | 06:07 +00:41 | 31:42 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:16 | 38:12 | 06:54 +02:22 | 37:49 +00:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:53 | 47:28 | 06:17 +00:36 | 44:43 +02:45 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 54:21 | 05:32 -00:28 | 51:00 +03:21 |
| Running 6 | 06:42 | 59:25 | 06:10 +00:32 | 56:32 +02:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:06:07 | 02:25 -00:16 | 01:02:42 +03:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 01:08:16 | 06:10 -00:23 | 01:05:07 +03:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 01:14:03 | 05:15 -00:48 | 01:11:17 +02:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:34 | 01:18:30 | 06:42 -00:08 | 01:16:32 +01:58 |
| Wall Balls | 04:13 | 01:25:04 | 05:31 -01:18 | 01:23:14 +01:50 |
| Roxzone | 07:16 | 01:36:25 | 07:40 -00:24 | 01:36:25 |
Alicja's total running time of 00:48:49 was 01:36 slower than the average time. This indicates that she could focus on improving her running performance to enhance her overall race time. However, it is worth noting that her best running lap of 00:04:38 was 00:37 faster than the average, showcasing her potential as a runner.
In conclusion, Alicja Sterma demonstrated a strong performance in the 2021 Birmingham Hyrox race. To further enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her running time, particularly in segments such as Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Pull, and Running 4, 5, and 6. By incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and techniques tailored to these areas, Alicja can continue to excel in future races. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparedness will also contribute to her overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Macarthur Jennifer | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:36:39 | |
| O'Hare Eilis | 2024 Milan | 01:36:31 | |
| Smith Kaya | 2023 London | 01:36:12 | |
| Mcateer Cheryl | 2021 Birmingham | 01:36:31 | |
| Ten Vergert Anne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:57 | |
| Moden Rebecka | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:55 | |
| Alvarez Luna Gabriela | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:13 | |
| Horvers Elke | 2024 Maastricht | 01:36:54 | |
| Davidson Lauren | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:06 | |
| Lapas Andrea | 2023 New York | 01:36:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:48:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
