Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O Rourke Megan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O Rourke Megan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O Rourke Megan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O Rourke Megan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:45 | 47:06 to 45:21 | 33.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:27 | 05:59 to 04:32 | 28.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:16 | 07:06 to 05:50 | 24.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:24 to 02:08 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 05:17 to 05:03 | 4.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 04:47 to 04:37 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:20 to 05:18 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| O Rourke Megan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:27 | 00:00 | 05:09 -01:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 03:27 | 05:08 +00:09 | 05:09 -01:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 08:44 | 05:30 +00:06 | 10:17 -01:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 14:20 | 02:44 -00:09 | 15:47 -01:27 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 16:55 | 05:47 +00:29 | 18:31 -01:36 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 23:11 | 05:48 -00:54 | 24:18 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 28:05 | 05:49 +00:40 | 30:06 -02:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:06 | 34:34 | 06:10 +00:56 | 35:55 -01:21 |
| Running 5 | 06:50 | 41:40 | 05:57 +00:53 | 42:05 -00:25 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 48:30 | 05:23 -00:03 | 48:02 +00:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:58 | 53:50 | 05:51 +01:07 | 53:25 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 01:00:48 | 02:15 +00:09 | 59:16 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 06:44 | 01:03:12 | 05:49 +00:55 | 01:01:31 +01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:47 | 01:09:56 | 04:49 -00:02 | 01:07:20 +02:36 |
| Running 8 | 04:50 | 01:14:43 | 06:15 -01:25 | 01:12:09 +02:34 |
| Wall Balls | 05:59 | 01:19:33 | 04:56 +01:03 | 01:18:24 +01:09 |
| Roxzone | 04:51 | 01:30:15 | 06:55 -02:04 | 01:30:15 |
Megan O Rourke delivered a commendable performance in the HYROX 2024 Dublin event. Ranked in the top 14% of 2696 athletes and the top 15% of her age group (25-29), Megan demonstrated her competitive edge in the race. Her overall time was 01:30:15, slightly slower than the average, primarily due to her total running time of 00:47:06, which was 00:43 slower than the average. Notably, Megan showed exceptional performance in the Roxzone segment, where she was 01:53 faster than average, indicating efficient transitions and rest periods.
Analysis of Megan’s splits reveals that she started the race quite swiftly, leading to an impressive 1st percentile rank in Running 1. This fast start may have led to slower times in later running segments, suggesting a potential pacing issue. Her performance indicates a balanced profile with both running and strength aspects, albeit with a slight inclination towards strength segments.
For future races, Megan should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nees Kim | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:29:46 | |
| Cerna Renata | 2024 Malaga | 01:30:27 | |
| Davies Helen | 2022 Birmingham | 01:30:19 | |
| Montelone Brooke | 2024 Anaheim | 01:29:51 | |
| Morgan Amy | 2024 Brisbane | 01:30:39 | |
| Zelenina Alexandra | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:00 | |
| Sazonova Anna | 2023 Singapore | 01:30:03 | |
| Pietsch Madyson | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:33 | |
| Ledger Katie | 2022 Birmingham | 01:30:41 | |
| Caron Mathilde | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:30:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
