Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcgill Erikka's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcgill Erikka's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcgill Erikka's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcgill Erikka's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:23 | 07:09 to 03:46 | 56.2% |
| Run Total | 01:25 | 43:01 to 41:36 | 23.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 02:39 to 01:56 | 11.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 04:17 to 04:02 | 4.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:13 | 02:28 to 02:15 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:52 to 04:50 | 0.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Mcgill Erikka | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:18 | 00:00 | 04:50 -01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 03:18 | 04:58 -00:06 | 04:50 -01:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 08:10 | 05:09 +00:10 | 09:48 -01:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 13:29 | 02:32 -00:04 | 14:57 -01:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 15:57 | 05:25 +00:30 | 17:29 -01:32 |
| Sled Pull | 04:25 | 21:52 | 05:14 -00:49 | 22:54 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 26:17 | 05:26 +00:36 | 28:08 -01:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:46 | 32:19 | 05:24 -00:38 | 33:34 -01:15 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 37:05 | 05:32 +00:31 | 38:58 -01:53 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 43:08 | 05:12 -00:16 | 44:30 -01:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 48:04 | 05:28 +00:33 | 49:42 -01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 54:05 | 02:06 +00:33 | 55:10 -01:05 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 56:44 | 05:25 +00:39 | 57:16 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:17 | 01:02:48 | 04:20 -00:03 | 01:02:41 +00:07 |
| Running 8 | 04:23 | 01:07:05 | 05:46 -01:23 | 01:07:01 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:09 | 01:11:28 | 04:24 +02:45 | 01:12:47 -01:19 |
| Roxzone | 04:46 | 01:23:15 | 06:04 -01:18 | 01:23:15 |
Erikka Mcgill's performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox event is impressive, with her overall rank sitting at the top 6% out of 2696 athletes. Her performance indicates a strong proficiency in running, with her total running time being 11 minutes faster than average. However, there is room for improvement in terms of her strength exercises. She excelled in the initial segments, with her running time in the first race being significantly faster than the average. However, she seemed to lose some steam in the middle segments, indicating a possible issue with pacing.
For future races, Erikka should consider a more measured and conservative start, preserving her energy for the middle and later segments of the race. This could prevent her from burning out too early. She should also focus on her transitions, ensuring she moves quickly and efficiently between the running and strength segments. Lastly, Erikka should work on her strength conditioning to improve her performance in the strength-based exercises, while maintaining her strong running abilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Momm Nadine | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:23:45 | |
| Cupit Toni | 2023 London | 01:22:51 | |
| Parals Bonay Clara | 2023 Barcelona | 01:22:55 | |
| Dupont Nyamekye | 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:27 | |
| Culy Jesa | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:23:01 | |
| Galleri Cinzia | 2024 Turin | 01:23:07 | |
| Van Broeck Femke | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:23:44 | |
| Wu Shunyi | 2019 New York | 01:23:42 | |
| Thomas Jessica | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:30 | |
| Meinke Kim | 2023 Hamburg | 01:23:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
