Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mc Nama Sophie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Nama Sophie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Nama Sophie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Nama Sophie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:22 | 47:43 to 45:21 | 44.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:44 | 06:16 to 04:32 | 32.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 06:14 to 05:25 | 15.4% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:35 to 05:18 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:15 to 02:08 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Mc Nama Sophie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 05:10 -01:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 03:36 | 05:08 -00:07 | 05:10 -01:34 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 08:37 | 05:30 +00:36 | 10:18 -01:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 14:43 | 02:44 -00:17 | 15:48 -01:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:37 | 17:10 | 05:47 +00:50 | 18:32 -01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 06:14 | 23:47 | 05:46 +00:28 | 24:19 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 06:33 | 30:01 | 05:49 +00:44 | 30:05 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:36 | 36:34 | 06:08 -02:32 | 35:54 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 06:59 | 40:10 | 05:57 +01:02 | 42:02 -01:52 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 47:09 | 05:23 +00:12 | 47:59 -00:50 |
| Running 6 | 06:50 | 52:44 | 05:51 +00:59 | 53:22 -00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 59:34 | 02:15 +00:00 | 59:13 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:01:49 | 05:49 +00:37 | 01:01:28 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 01:08:15 | 04:47 -00:14 | 01:07:17 +00:58 |
| Running 8 | 04:38 | 01:12:48 | 06:14 -01:36 | 01:12:04 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:16 | 01:17:26 | 04:55 +01:21 | 01:18:18 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 06:32 | 01:30:05 | 06:52 -00:20 | 01:30:05 |
Sophie Mc Nama showed a commendable performance at the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race, ranking in the top 14% of all athletes and in the top 23% of her age group. An analysis of her performance reveals that Sophie has a clear strength in strength-based segments, with particularly impressive performances in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Burpees Broad Jump segments. Notably, Sophie's Burpees Broad Jump segment was significantly faster than average, showing her potential in this area.
However, her overall running time was slower than average, indicating a potential area of improvement. Sophie started the race with a strong pace, completing the first running segment significantly faster than average, but her pace slowed during subsequent running segments. This could suggest that her initial pacing may have been too fast, leading to fatigue in later parts of the race.
Overall, Sophie's strengths lie more in the strength-based exercises, with room for improvement in her running performance.
Based on her performance, Sophie could benefit from implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carry Alexandra | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:30:04 | |
| Thomas Iman | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:41 | |
| Sheehan Caitlyn | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:18 | |
| Denervaud Laure | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:36 | |
| Capellari Lisa | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:34 | |
| Andersson Sofia | 2023 Malmö | 01:30:28 | |
| Blaszezynski Sarah | 2023 Paris | 01:29:56 | |
| Helminger Viktoria | 2019 Hamburg | 01:30:08 | |
| Gaskin Jordan | 2024 Sydney | 01:30:06 | |
| Lakkis Fay | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:30:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
