Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mc Mahon Philly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Mahon Philly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Mahon Philly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Mahon Philly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:25 | 44:34 to 42:09 | 48.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:06 | 06:01 to 04:55 | 21.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:35 | 06:46 to 06:11 | 11.6% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:09 to 04:46 | 7.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:20 to 02:05 | 5.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 05:17 to 05:07 | 3.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 04:51 to 04:43 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Mc Mahon Philly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:26 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:26 | 04:28 -00:13 | 04:42 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 08:41 | 05:01 +00:14 | 09:10 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 13:56 | 02:57 -00:18 | 14:11 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 16:35 | 05:27 +00:14 | 17:08 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 22:16 | 05:01 -00:10 | 22:35 -00:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 27:07 | 05:27 +00:38 | 27:36 -00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:17 | 33:12 | 05:24 -00:07 | 33:03 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 38:29 | 05:37 +00:44 | 38:27 +00:02 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 44:50 | 04:51 +00:18 | 44:04 +00:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 49:59 | 05:29 +00:34 | 48:55 +01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 56:02 | 02:13 +00:07 | 54:24 +01:38 |
| Running 7 | 06:16 | 58:22 | 05:27 +00:49 | 56:37 +01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:04:38 | 05:11 +00:50 | 01:02:04 +02:34 |
| Running 8 | 04:29 | 01:10:39 | 06:07 -01:38 | 01:07:15 +03:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:46 | 01:15:08 | 06:37 +00:09 | 01:13:22 +01:46 |
| Roxzone | 05:13 | 01:27:01 | 07:02 -01:49 | 01:27:01 |
Philly Mc Mahon, competing in the 35-39 age group, put forth a commendable performance at the 2024 Dublin Hyrox event. He finished in the top 38% overall and within the top 45% of his age group. His total running time, however, was slightly behind the average, hinting at a need for more focused endurance training. His strength segments, on the other hand, were consistently well-executed, indicating that he is more of a strength-based athlete. Looking at the pacing, Philly started strong with his first run segment being faster than average. However, as the race progressed, his running times started to slow down, suggesting a need for better pacing and endurance management.
To optimize his performance in future races, Philly should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Light Tom | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:41 | |
| Kellett Marc | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:30 | |
| Bridges Paul | 2022 Manchester | 01:26:52 | |
| Schlüter Markus | 2023 Hannover | 01:27:31 | |
| Louie Larry | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:26:45 | |
| Underhill Tom | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:42 | |
| Krüger Julian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:27:12 | |
| Radloff Maik | 2023 Hamburg | 01:26:34 | |
| Wagner Joaquin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:12 | |
| Gruber Simon | 2019 Wien | 01:27:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
