Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 904 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mc Laughlin Lisa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Laughlin Lisa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Laughlin Lisa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Laughlin Lisa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 04:45 to 01:50 | 43.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:48 | 05:12 to 03:24 | 26.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:14 | 04:57 to 03:43 | 18.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:37 | 05:03 to 04:26 | 9.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 04:30 to 04:22 | 2.0% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:58 to 04:56 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:02 to 39:02 | 0.0% |
| Mc Laughlin Lisa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:52 | 00:00 | 04:37 -01:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 02:52 | 04:52 -00:33 | 04:37 -01:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 07:11 | 04:53 +00:09 | 09:29 -02:18 |
| Sled Push | 01:58 | 12:13 | 02:26 -00:28 | 14:22 -02:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 14:11 | 05:08 +00:06 | 16:48 -02:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 19:25 | 04:55 -00:25 | 21:56 -02:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 23:55 | 05:08 +00:26 | 26:51 -02:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 29:29 | 04:58 +00:05 | 31:59 -02:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 34:32 | 05:14 +00:18 | 36:57 -02:25 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 40:04 | 05:05 -00:07 | 42:11 -02:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 45:02 | 05:12 +00:20 | 47:16 -02:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:45 | 50:34 | 02:00 +02:45 | 52:28 -01:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 55:19 | 05:09 +00:23 | 54:28 +00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:57 | 01:00:51 | 04:04 +00:53 | 59:37 +01:14 |
| Running 8 | 03:47 | 01:05:48 | 05:27 -01:40 | 01:03:41 +02:07 |
| Wall Balls | 05:12 | 01:09:35 | 04:04 +01:08 | 01:09:08 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 04:09 | 01:18:49 | 05:37 -01:28 | 01:18:49 |
Lisa Mc Laughlin, competing in the Hyrox race, has showcased an impressive performance, ranking in the top 3% of a total of 2696 athletes. Her total running time of 00:39:02 was faster than average by 01:55, indicating her strength lies in running. Lisa's strong start in the race, with her first running segment being faster than average by 01:42, and her ability to maintain a fast pace in the final running segment, which was faster than average by 01:41, shows commendable pacing. Lisa's performance in the roxzone was also faster than the average, proving her fitness and transition time to be excellent. However, there were segments where Lisa's performance was slower than average, suggesting areas for improvement.
As Lisa has a strong running profile, she should continue to leverage this strength in her races. However, she should also consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross Katrina | 2023 London | 01:18:31 | |
| Ammendola Maria | 2023 Barcelona | 01:18:57 | |
| Gregory Lois | 2024 London | 01:19:11 | |
| Henley Philippa | 2024 London | 01:18:50 | |
| Burgess Chloe | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:48 | |
| Orlandini Rebecca | 2023 Glasgow | 01:19:11 | |
| Matuska Siobhan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:31 | |
| Friedman Stephanie | 2024 New York | 01:18:44 | |
| Caballero Alvaro Laura | 2023 Bilbao | 01:19:11 | |
| Zuccolotto Sara | 2024 Turin | 01:18:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
