Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 882 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Matuska Siobhan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Matuska Siobhan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Matuska Siobhan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Matuska Siobhan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:05 | 41:19 to 39:14 | 44.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:44 | 06:03 to 04:19 | 37.1% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:10 to 04:55 | 5.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 03:53 to 03:40 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:53 to 04:41 | 4.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:57 to 01:48 | 3.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 04:25 to 04:23 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:22 to 03:22 | 0.0% |
| Matuska Siobhan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:34 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 04:34 | 04:52 +00:01 | 04:36 -00:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 09:27 | 04:52 -00:18 | 09:28 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 01:34 | 14:01 | 02:25 -00:51 | 14:20 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 15:35 | 05:07 -00:19 | 16:45 -01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 06:03 | 20:23 | 04:55 +01:08 | 21:52 -01:29 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 26:26 | 05:08 -00:11 | 26:47 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 31:23 | 04:56 -00:31 | 31:55 -00:32 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 35:48 | 05:13 -00:06 | 36:51 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 40:55 | 05:05 +00:05 | 42:04 -01:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 46:05 | 05:11 -00:02 | 47:09 -01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 51:14 | 02:00 -00:03 | 52:20 -01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 53:11 | 05:08 -00:05 | 54:20 -01:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:53 | 58:14 | 04:02 -00:09 | 59:28 -01:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:02:07 | 05:25 +01:45 | 01:03:30 -01:23 |
| Wall Balls | 03:22 | 01:09:17 | 04:03 -00:41 | 01:08:55 +00:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:00 | 01:18:31 | 05:33 +00:27 | 01:18:31 |
Siobhan Matuska delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an impressive overall rank of 94 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 5%. Her age group rank of 21 out of 406 athletes also highlights her competitive edge. Siobhan showed notable strength in strength-based exercises, particularly in the Sled Push, where she ranked in the top 1 percentile. However, her total running time was 14 seconds slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in endurance running. Her pacing strategy appeared balanced in the initial segments, but she experienced a significant slowdown in Running 8. Overall, Siobhan exhibits a hybrid profile with strengths in specific exercises but requires improvement in running endurance and transitions.
Siobhan’s Sled Pull time was considerably slower, ranking her in the 90th percentile. To improve this segment:
Despite a strong start, Siobhan’s total running time was slower than average, particularly in Running 8. To enhance her running performance:
Time spent in the Roxzone was slower, indicating a need for quicker transitions:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Watson Kate | 2024 Brisbane | 01:18:15 | |
| Mac Mata Sandra | 2023 Hannover | 01:18:05 | |
| Turton Paige | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:54 | |
| Prat Elodie | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:18:34 | |
| Eaves Sarah | 2024 London | 01:18:29 | |
| Groeneweg Simona | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:18:08 | |
| Beaty Andrea | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:35 | |
| Coughlan Hannah | 2024 London | 01:18:05 | |
| Fischer Marie Luise | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:13 | |
| Harrison Sally | 2024 London | 01:18:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
