Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Matthews Gillian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Matthews Gillian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Matthews Gillian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Matthews Gillian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:36 | 46:34 to 42:58 | 63.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:56 | 04:58 to 04:02 | 16.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 02:53 to 02:22 | 9.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:27 to 05:15 | 3.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:10 to 02:01 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:17 to 05:09 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:58 to 04:55 | 0.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 05:01 to 04:58 | 0.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Matthews Gillian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:58 | 03:41 | 05:01 -00:03 | 04:59 -01:18 |
| Running 2 | 06:04 | 08:39 | 05:16 +00:48 | 10:00 -01:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 14:43 | 02:36 +00:17 | 15:16 -00:33 |
| Running 3 | 06:34 | 17:36 | 05:32 +01:02 | 17:52 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 05:01 | 24:10 | 05:25 -00:24 | 23:24 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:35 | 29:11 | 05:34 +01:01 | 28:49 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:27 | 35:46 | 05:40 -00:13 | 34:23 +01:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:25 | 41:13 | 05:41 +00:44 | 40:03 +01:10 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 47:38 | 05:16 +00:01 | 45:44 +01:54 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 52:55 | 05:35 +00:50 | 51:00 +01:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 59:20 | 02:10 +00:00 | 56:35 +02:45 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:01:30 | 05:34 +00:52 | 58:45 +02:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 01:07:56 | 04:29 -00:14 | 01:04:19 +03:37 |
| Running 8 | 04:28 | 01:12:11 | 05:57 -01:29 | 01:08:48 +03:23 |
| Wall Balls | 04:58 | 01:16:39 | 04:34 +00:24 | 01:14:45 +01:54 |
| Roxzone | 04:14 | 01:25:43 | 06:24 -02:10 | 01:25:43 |
Gillian's performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race was commendable, placing in the top 9% of 2696 athletes, and ranking in the top 8% in her age group. Despite her overall rank, her total running time was slower than average, suggesting that she may need to focus on improving her running speed. However, her quick recovery in the roxzone, faster than average by 02:01, indicates a strong ability to recover and transition between exercises. Gillian started the race strong with a fast running 1, but slowed down in subsequent running segments. This suggests she may have started too fast, leading to a slower pace later on in the race.
To improve her overall race performance, Gillian should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sorry Carolyn | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:46 | |
| AbdelNour Amanda | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:40 | |
| Hodzic Zerina | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:30 | |
| Kindl Salome | 2024 Berlin | 01:25:14 | |
| Gonzalez Petersen | 2024 Malaga | 01:25:41 | |
| Haynes Amy | 2024 London | 01:25:49 | |
| Schupke Katarzyna | 2024 Poznan | 01:25:53 | |
| Elsby Kathryn | 2024 London | 01:26:10 | |
| Alessandra Holtmann Julia | 2022 Basel | 01:25:56 | |
| Wilson Jess | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
