Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 166 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Martin Joseph's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Martin Joseph's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Martin Joseph's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Martin Joseph's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 14:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:46 | 01:07:12 to 58:26 | 60.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:44 | 14:36 to 08:52 | 39.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 07:10 to 07:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 08:09 to 08:09 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:35 to 09:35 | 0.0% |
| Martin Joseph | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 06:11 -01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 04:33 | 05:04 -00:11 | 06:11 -01:38 |
| Running 2 | 08:14 | 09:26 | 07:00 +01:14 | 11:15 -01:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:52 | 17:40 | 04:12 -00:20 | 18:15 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 09:42 | 21:32 | 07:55 +01:47 | 22:27 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 07:10 | 31:14 | 07:51 -00:41 | 30:22 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 10:07 | 38:24 | 07:54 +02:13 | 38:13 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 14:36 | 48:31 | 09:22 +05:14 | 46:07 +02:24 |
| Running 5 | 10:03 | 01:03:07 | 08:41 +01:22 | 55:29 +07:38 |
| Rowing | 05:36 | 01:13:10 | 05:50 -00:14 | 01:04:10 +09:00 |
| Running 6 | 09:00 | 01:18:46 | 08:26 +00:34 | 01:10:00 +08:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:50 | 01:27:46 | 03:16 -00:26 | 01:18:26 +09:20 |
| Running 7 | 08:43 | 01:30:36 | 08:18 +00:25 | 01:21:42 +08:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:09 | 01:39:19 | 09:09 -01:00 | 01:30:00 +09:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:54 | 01:47:28 | 11:19 -04:25 | 01:39:09 +08:19 |
| Wall Balls | 09:35 | 01:54:22 | 11:16 -01:41 | 01:50:28 +03:54 |
| Roxzone | 09:49 | 02:13:38 | 11:54 -02:05 | 02:13:38 |
Joseph Martin displayed a commendable performance, finishing in the top 64% of all participants. His overall strengths lay in his roxzone and wall ball segments, where he was significantly faster than the average. However, his total running time was slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in this area. He started the race much quicker than the average, but his pace declined significantly in the later stages, with his running segments 3, 4, 5 and 7 being slower than the average. This suggests that he may have started too fast and not conserved enough energy for the later stages of the race. As his strength segments were generally faster than his running ones, it can be concluded that he has a strength-oriented profile.
Joseph should consider implementing the following strategies during his race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hika Jonathan | 2023 Anaheim | 02:13:18 | |
| Czubaty Daniel | 2018 Essen | 02:13:10 | |
| Zani Wonga | 2024 Cape Town | 02:14:02 | |
| Wong Daryl | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:13:46 | |
| Bannert Sven | 2018 Essen | 02:13:12 | |
| Vestergaard Andreas | 2024 Malaga | 02:13:31 | |
| Welsh David | 2023 London | 02:13:27 | |
| Makdoum Fouad | 2024 Turin | 02:13:17 | |
| Majid Umar | 2024 Glasgow | 02:13:18 | |
| Hopkins David | 2023 Malaga | 02:13:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Malaga | 02:14:25 | |
| 2023 Dublin | 02:30:16 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 02:41:17 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 02:08:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
