Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 787 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Marston Avina's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Marston Avina's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Marston Avina's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Marston Avina's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 03:04 | 09:31 to 06:27 | 70.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:47 | 08:00 to 07:13 | 17.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 05:45 to 05:20 | 9.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:43 to 05:38 | 1.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 03:05 to 03:03 | 0.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 50:13 to 50:13 | 0.0% |
| Marston Avina | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:31 | 00:00 | 05:39 +00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:45 | 06:31 | 05:21 +00:24 | 05:39 +00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 12:16 | 06:05 -00:15 | 11:00 +01:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 18:06 | 03:06 -00:01 | 17:05 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 06:07 | 21:11 | 06:25 -00:18 | 20:11 +01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 09:31 | 27:18 | 06:35 +02:56 | 26:36 +00:42 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 36:49 | 06:28 -00:12 | 33:11 +03:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:00 | 43:05 | 07:25 +00:35 | 39:39 +03:26 |
| Running 5 | 06:10 | 51:05 | 06:40 -00:30 | 47:04 +04:01 |
| Rowing | 05:43 | 57:15 | 05:39 +00:04 | 53:44 +03:31 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 01:02:58 | 06:31 -00:28 | 59:23 +03:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 01:09:01 | 02:29 -00:35 | 01:05:54 +03:07 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 01:10:55 | 06:30 -00:21 | 01:08:23 +02:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 01:17:04 | 05:37 -00:08 | 01:14:53 +02:11 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:22:33 | 07:12 -00:02 | 01:20:30 +02:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:12 | 01:29:43 | 06:01 -00:49 | 01:27:42 +02:01 |
| Roxzone | 07:19 | 01:42:06 | 08:23 -01:04 | 01:42:06 |
Avina Marston's total running time was 00:51 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her running abilities, as this segment contributed to a significant portion of her overall time. However, it is worth noting that her best running lap was 00:05:50, which was faster than the average.
In conclusion, Avina Marston had a strong performance in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race. To further improve her performance, she should focus on the sled pull, running 1, burpees broad jump, and ski erg segments. By incorporating specific training strategies, such as strength training exercises, interval training, and form corrections, she can enhance her performance in these areas. Additionally, she should focus on pacing herself throughout the race and minimizing transition time. With these improvements, Avina Marston can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Albrecht Monia | 2021 Hamburg | 01:42:32 | |
| Castellani Marta | 2024 Turin | 01:42:08 | |
| Kovac Nina | 2024 Dubai | 01:41:44 | |
| Minßen Ute | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:42:23 | |
| Brageot Samantha | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:42:08 | |
| Carrión Hernández Patricia | 2022 Valencia | 01:42:31 | |
| Macdonald Emma | 2024 London | 01:41:49 | |
| Jasari Laura | 2018 Hamburg | 01:42:05 | |
| Chan Kylie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:52 | |
| Bosio Ilenia | 2024 Turin | 01:41:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:38:42 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:48:43 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:54:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
